The Sixties Radical Thank You John Boehner for Selling The Country Down The River

After watching the idiots in the House pass the bogus debt ceiling increase I wanted to cry first then I became mad as hell.

This is pure insanity.

John “Jackass” Boehner and his idiot side kick Eric Cantor think they have saved the day when in reality they have forced this nation over the cliff.

You have just given the evil Obama and his merry destroyers the Democrat Socialist Party a gift.

This is a campaign gift of our hard earned money for the evil ones reelection.

This is our money not yours.

We have been screwed and tattooed by the people whom we sent to Washington to fix this problem instead they rolled over played dead.

The straw dogs are these- we will default our obligations, Social Security checks will not go out, we have to tax the rich to make sure they pay for their fair share, do away with tax loop holes for the rich, the evil oil companies and huge corporations, balancing the budget on the backs of the poor ad nauseum.

This compromise lies are these- no tax increases, the Bush tax cuts will not sunset, the Tea Party is the big winners, this is a start, this is the best we can get.

God help these fools.

John Boehner you have signed our country’s death warrant.

In the name of compromise you have pissed away our nations heritage.

At this rate the USA will be broke in a matter of months.

What part of BROKE DON’T YOU GET.

Raising the debt ceiling is doubling down on the failed polices of the evil Obama and his buds-the Democrat Socialist Party.

As soon as the bill was passed Harry Reid said on the Senate floor we will now have to raise taxes.

He said if not the automatic riders in the bill will kick in.

I am stupid or what.

Boehner, the other talking dummy Mitch McConnell said there were no taxes increases in the bill.

The evil Obama said after he signed the countries drop dead bill that taxes will be raised and he will ask for more stimulus money disguised as the Democrat Socialist Party slush fund.

Need I say more.

We have been had by the liars in the Republican Party, John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Eric Cantor, John McCain etal.

Add to the list Fox “Kiss My Ass” News, and the usual liars, LSMSD, NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN.

The headlines are right this is like pissing in the ocean.

This is a joke.

Except it is not funny.

The punch line is  this The USA is now a Socialist Marxist society run by the ruling class.

The ruling class of Washington won the day.

If we don’t rebel and fight back our country is doomed.

If you ruling class lairs and jackasses think we will forget.

You are wrong.

To quote Patrick Henry- We have just begun to fight.

The 2012 election there will be a major hell to be paid.

We will kick your asses out of office starting with the evil one Obama.

This is not a threat but a promise.

Rush Limbaugh said this about the deal. This is taken  word for word from his website.

RUSH: Well, the Senate is prepared to vote on the bill.  It’s a fait accompli.  It is going to happen, and depending on where you look, everybody’s claiming to be winners, and in other places you look everybody’s claiming to be losers.  If everybody lost, it means it’s probably a pretty good deal.  If everybody’s unhappy, it’s that line of thinking.  I look at this, ladies and gentlemen, and I see an absolute, total waste of effort, a total waste of time.  It’s gonna come down now to how dispirited people are and just how much they want to continue to fight for this, because what happened here is typical Washington.  It’s the same old, same old.  There’s nothing really new in this in the way it all happened when you boil it all down.  

We’re gonna reach a new debt limit here today sometime, and then we’re gonna reach another debt limit in three or four months, and then we’re gonna reach another debt limit, and we’re gonna keep spending, and we’re not gonna change the baseline any at all.  And we’re gonna be told it’s the best we can do with just one-third of the government, meaning the House of Representatives. 
Ladies and gentlemen, how many of you believe that there are budget cuts in the new debt ceiling bill? You’ve heard that there are cuts, have you not? We’re cutting here, we’re cutting there. Yeah, well, what I want to know is why would anybody believe that this deal includes any significant cuts in spending? If it really cuts spending, why would we have to raise the debt limit by $2.4 trillion? Why? And we’re still gonna get downgraded, and the markets are still not happy, and all the reasons we were sold for doing this have turned out to be bogus. Vladimir Putin, he’s out hunting. He says the United States is “a parasite on the world economy.” A parasite, meaning our growth is all phony.
It’s all based on borrowing, it isn’t real, and we are gobbling up all the resources around the world just to sustain our spending. We’re really not the rich country that we are is what Putin means. It’s all borrowed, it’s all fake, it’s all phony. We’re parasites. All the numbers in this deal are just government math. Government math’s even crazier than Farrakhan’s Million Man Math Made Easy. Rand Paul has an open letter on his website: To paraphrase Senator Jim DeMint: When you’re speeding toward the edge of a cliff, you don’t set the cruise control. You stop the car. The current deal to raise the debt ceiling doesn’t stop us from going over the fiscal cliff.

“At best, it slows us from going over it at 80 mph to going over it at 60 mph. This plan never balances. The President called for a ‘balanced approach.’ But the American people are calling for a balanced budget. This deal does nothing to fix the overreaches of both parties over the past few years: Obamacare, TARP, trillion-dollar wars, runaway entitlement spending. They are all cemented into place with this deal, and their legacy will be trillions of dollars in new debt. The deal that is pending before us now,” get this, “Adds at least $7 trillion to our debt over the next 10 years.” Not $2.4 trillion; $7 trillion. “The deal purports to ‘cut’ $2.1 trillion, but the ‘cut’ is from a baseline that adds $10 trillion to the debt.”

As you well know, because we’ve been we’ve been explaining this in easily understandable detail all wee. I love the illustration. We could prepare a budget that is a freeze next year that doesn’t spend a dime more than this year, and it would be scored as a nine and a half trillion-dollar cut because of the baseline, because of how the budget is expected to grow. “This deal, even if all targets are met and the Super Committee wields its mandate – results in a BEST case scenario of still adding more than $7 trillion more in debt over the next 10 years. That is sickening.” Folks, I’m gonna give you a little history. I remember when this program started — well, even before it started here, when I was in Sacramento and the show started in 1984 — getting phone calls throughout the years from people concerned about the national debt, and I pooh-poohed it.
I told these people, “You know I’ve been hearing about the national debt my whole life.” My grandfather was telling me about the national debt. My dad told me about the national debt. Everybody talked about the national debt and how it’s gonna consume us one day and it’s outta control, and I said, “I’ve been hearing it for years and years and years, and we’re still here. I’ve been hearing this national debt business for years and years and years, and we’re richer as a nation, and we’re more prosperous than ever.” So I said, “This national debt business? Big deal. We owe it to ourselves, so it’s really not any big deal.” Now, at the time that I was saying that, it was still manageable in size.

Now here I am an old fuddy-duddy, and I don’t have that attitude about the national debt anymore. Now this national debt is $14.3 trillion plus the $2.4 trillion that’s gonna be added, so we’re just under $17 trillion, and another $10 trillion’s gonna be added in ten years, maybe as much as the number 13. We could be looking at a $27 trillion national debt, and now I am no longer of the attitude that it doesn’t matter, because we owe it to ourselves. I don’t know when the change came. Well, I do know when the change came. It came during this particular regime and administration, when I was able to detect that a number of these things are being done on purpose, to purposely inflict harm on the private sector. This amount of debt has to be serviced. I mean, the idea of paying it off is impossible, but it has to be serviced.

That’s gonna require tax rates that nobody will be willing to work in order to pay.

By the way, folks, this doesn’t end anything.  The next thing that’s going to happen is that President Obama is going to ask for more stimulus spending as part of his reelection campaign.  You watch.  More stimulus spending and the Federal Reserve will probably print more money.  There probably will be a QE3.  These next months leading into the presidential campaign, the president is going to do what all presidents do.  He’s going to use every bit of presidential power at his disposal to orient the government toward buying votes, doing things for people, without regard to the budget, without regard to any fiscal sense or sanity whatsoever, it doesn’t matter.  Particularly we know it doesn’t matter to Barack Obama because he’s gotten us here in the first place.  

It’s why holding the line on this bill was so important and why it could have really put the brakes on Barack Obama.  But now that he’s got the authority to run that debt up real fast, how he chooses to do it, create a slush fund, send the money to unions, people that pay dues so the money comes back to him in the form of campaign contributions, you ain’t seen nothing yet.  The things that are sickening to all of us about the way the ruling class and politicians use government for their own benefit is about to go on steroids.  If you’re ticked off now, you don’t know what ticked off is.  From Rand Paul’s open letter on his website after he mentions that it adds at least $7 trillion to the debt over the next ten years, probably ten trillion because of the baseline, best case scenario, it never, ever balances.  I mean no pretense to balance, doesn’t come close.  
The Super Committee’s mandate,” the six Republicans and the six Democrats, “is to add $7 trillion in new debt. Let’s be clear: $2.1 trillion in reductions off a nearly $10 trillion,10-year debt is still more than $7 trillion in debt. The Super Committee limits the constitutional check of the filibuster by expediting passage of bills with a simple majority. The Super Committee is not precluded from any issue, therefore the filibuster could be rendered most. In addition, the plan harms the possible passage of a Balanced Budget Amendment. Since the goal is never to balance, having the BBA as a ‘trigger’ ensures that the committee will simply report its $1.2 trillion deficit reduction plan and never move to a BBA vote.




The Sixties Radical on Fake Conservatives and Republicans who are selling us a bill goods

The crap that passes for news these days is ridiculous. Fox News, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSLSD, CNN, and the rest wouldn’t know the truth if it bit them in the ass.

The Armageddon that is being hyped by these stupid idiots is worse than dumb.

Oh, my God, the USA is going to default on their loans. We won’t have the money to pay off the bondholders. Social Security Checks won’t go out. We will have to shut down government. The sky is falling down if we don’t raise the debt ceiling we are screwed.

This is pure bullshit.

First the USA payment on the debt to bond holders is 29 billion.

Guess what folks we have enough money coming in each month to play this sucker.

The Democrat Socialist Party, the evil Obama, the jackasses in the Republican Party are playing us for suckers.

They flat out think we are stupid.

John “Chicken Shit” Boehner has been playing the age-old game of playing both ends against the middle.

He says boys here’s the deal in public while in private John “ Double Talk” Boehner, the evil Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck “YOU Schumer, Joe “Bite Me” Bidden, and the rest have secretly negotiated a deal to do the bait and switch deal set forth by the back stabber Mitch “Principles My Ass McConnell.

Then the Speaker of House has the balls to say to the real conservatives in House look guys I’ll put in a non descript blank Balanced Budget Amendment in the bill to satisfy your silly asses.

The dumb rank file Republicans fell in line like sheep and voted to pass this hellhole of a bill to the Senate.

The only folks who had the balls to stand up to this monstrosity of a bill were brave 22 House members.

Chuck “YOU Schumer said it best- We can’t bribe this folks to get what we want.

Guess what truer words were never spoken.

No one in the deadbeat media picked it up.

The only media types who are standing up to these lairs in the media, the House, the Senate, the evil Obama are Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, and Sean Hannity.

Laura Ingraham you are political hack for the Republican Party.

Bill Crystal you are a fool who would sell his mother to keep his gig on Fox News.

Charles Krauthammer you spew out crap outta both sides of your mouth.

You are one of the wizards of stupid who are leading this country into a hell it will never return from.

You have hidden the fact you were part of the Carter administration and a speechwriter for Walter F. Mondull, I mean Mondale

Why should we believe the garbage that comes out of your filthy mouth?

Another media fool on Fox News Bob Beckel is calling The Tea Party anarchists. He is spewing this crap that we have to learn the art of compromise.

I can dig it.

How do you compromise between food and poison?


Oh that’s right Beckel is another one of those Walter Mondull, I Mondale Democrat Socialist Party hacks.

Dude, you are a Typhoid Mary. The shit you pedal doesn’t kill you it kills us.

George Will is another one of those sycophant media types também.

Will writes his BS for the National Review and the Washington Post writers group.

Except this fool has defended the evil Obama.

Will views us as cretins também.

I love folks who talk out of both sides of their mouth.

I am glad you weren’t around when the Revolutionary War was taking place.

Will would sell us out too.

You see the fools the only reason John “Chicken Shit, Lets Cut a Deal “ Boehner is Speaker of the House is the result of cretins like me. 

That’s what you really think of folks who are law abiding citizens who believe in the God of the Bible and the Constitution.

So we’ll tell you what wizards of stupid blow it out your collective butts.

We The People know the dirty little secrets you have.

The base line budget still has in it stimulus money disguised as a slush fund for the Democrat Socialist party.

Look the truth is this nation cannot continue on this path.

If we do our destruction is eminent.

This is the truth.

It is not a matter years but months.

Put together a real bill.

We have to have Cut, Cap, and Balance.

Make real cuts.

In the real world if this garbage you pedal as a budget you clowns would get thrown in jail or fired a long time ago.

I would rather deal with a Gonif.

At least dealing with a thief you know what you get,

With butt holes like you who knows.

If you don’t know the tern look it up a good Yiddish Dictionary.

Guess what here is the real kicker the evil Obama will invoke the 14th amendment to get the money he wants to spend.

This evil man has wanton and total disregard for the Constitution.

Obama is our King and we are the servants.

It comes down to this.

The evil Prez Obama, John Boehner, Eric Cantor, The entire sycophant media, the Democrat Socialist Party, The Elitist Republican Party all lie.

We know it.

The Sixties Radical The Lies Told by Elite Republicans and their Buds in the Media

The drum beat from the media and the Republican leadership is a bunch of bullshit.

They are scream from Capital Hill “This is the best deal we can get so deal with it.”

This is pure bull crap.

I am sick and tired of this shit.

Imagine if Dwight Eisenhower said this bull crap when the Germans had his troops pinned on Normandy.

This is best deal we can get so lets pull back.

Instead the American troops gutted it out and drove the Nazis all the back to Germany.

Imagine President Lincoln said this after his Union troops were defeated battle after battle.

Okay guys this is the best deal we can get so let the South have the south and we’ll take the North.


Lincoln kept looking for a general who would lead the Union troops to victory.

Ulysses S. Grant.


Victory for the nation.

Imagine the leaders of the Continental Congress giving up and saying this is the best deal we can get after George Washington suffered ass kicking after ass kicking in the early part of the war. The war changed a few years later when Washington won the day  with a huge victory over the British and their Hessian troops at Trenton.

What chicken shit John Boehner and the rest of the Republican leadership are doing is playing the blame game.

Here is the horrible bill so now the balls in your court.

The Democrat Socialist Party has said this baby is DOA. 

Fight for our rights.

This is not a freakin game.

Our countries very life is on the line.

We have to stand up and fight.



Over the past few days Republican Leadership has been calling shows like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity to get these people on board with their bullshit plan.

The talking heads in the media are trashing people like me.

They think we are a bunch creatures who should go back under the rocks from where we came.

A little history fools. If it wasn’t for folks like me John Boehner would never have become the speaker of the House.

The Republican Party was dead after the 2008 election.

Instead of running on conservative principles the idiots in charge John McCain decided to take the no road to a loss.

Conservative principles are these life, liberty, economic freedom, the pursuit of happiness, belief in the God of the Bible, Judaism, Christianity, or the religion of your choice, family, education, morals and values, right and wrong, judgments, the rule of law, The Ten Commandments, and the Constitution.

Before you have a cow with the word judgments let me explain. We better have judgments if not you are screwed as a person.

You better be able to judge what is right or wrong.

 The Constitution is a good start so read this baby sometime.

Then try John Locke.

The best deal you can get- how about Neville Chamberlain taking the deal with Adolph Hitler.

This was a deal with evil.

Chamberlain held up the paper and said we have peace.

Hitler broke the deal and that bastard murdered seven million of my ancestors.

The sad fact is this. We don’t have years to get our house in order.

It could be as little as months before this house of cards will come crumbling down.

John Boehner and his ilk are like the alcoholic who keeps on drinking.

They don’t see how they are destroying their lives, the lives of their family, and everyone they come in contact with. 

Sure they feel bad but when King Alcohol comes a calling they pick the sucker up.

They are blind to the destruction they are causing.

Each time they drink and they expect different results.

Instead it is the total destruction of the person, their family and everyone else who gets in their way.

The booze in this case is other people’s money and the power to control our lives.

John Boehner, Eric Cantor, John McCain etal are in denial. No this not the river in Egypt

Look folks the Democrat Socialist Party, the evil Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck “YOU” Schumer, the Left, the lap dog media, and the Libs are out to destroy us.

They hate us Conservatives.

We stand in their way from taking over this country.

This is a real war.

If the evil Obama wins our country will be destroyed. This nation will turned into a pure Marxist state.

You can kiss all your freedom bye-bye.

The evil King Obama will run this country with an iron fist.

The Left will control our every action from shitting to what much food we can buy to what kind of car we can drive to what kind of food we can eat while at the same time they say and do what they want.

Obama and the Democrat Party are pure evil.

They have to be destroyed.

When good compromises with evil, evil wins.

Neville Chamberlain is a prime example of this.

Here is some food for thought-

Benjamin Franklin  – In the beginning of the Contest with Great Britain, when we were sensible of danger we had daily prayer in this room for the Divine protection – Our prayers, Sir, were heard, and they were graciously answered. All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a superintending providence in our favor. To that kind providence we owe this happy opportunity of consulting in peace on the means of establishing our future national felicity. And have we now forgotten that powerful Friend? or do we imagine we no longer need His Assistance? AND: I pronounce it as certain that there was never yet a truly great man that was not at the same time truly virtuous.”  (The Busy-body, No. 3, 18 February 1728)  Reference: The Works of Benjamin Franklin, Bigelow, ed., vol. 1 (350)

James Madison, Primary Author of the U.S. Constitution: Article I of the Constitution begins: “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.” Section 8 of Article I then goes on to enumerate those powers, of which James Madison wrote: If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions.”

“We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind of self-government; upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God.”

“The preservation of a free government requires not merely that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained; but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great Barrier which defends the rights of the people. The Rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment, exceed the commission from which they derive their authority and are Tyrants. The people who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them, and are slaves.”

“It is impossible for the man of pious reflection not to perceive in it [The Constitution] a finger of that almighty hand which has been so frequently and signally extended to our relief in the critical stages of the revolution.”

“Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government.”

With respect to the two words general welfare, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators. It broaches a new Constitutional doctrine of vast consequence, and demanding the serious attention of the public. I consider it myself as subverting the fundamental and characteristic principle of the government; as contrary to the true and fair, as well as the received construction, and as bidding defiance to the sense in which the Constitution is known to have been proposed, advocated and adopted. If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions.”

“The future and success of America is not in this Constitution, but in the laws of God upon which this Constitution is founded.”

“If individuals be not influenced by moral principles; it is in vain to look for public virtue; it is, therefore, the duty of legislators to enforce, both by precept and example, the utility, as well as the necessity of a strict adherence to the rules of distributive justice.” –James Madison, in response to Washington’s first Inaugural address, 1789

“Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.”

“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.”

The Sixties Radical The Statists and The Media are Lairs

Once again the ruling class doesn’t have a clue on what how the real world operates.

John Boehner is another in long line of jackass politicians who are raping the American people with the stupid fiscal ideas.

In the real world a cut in spending means exactly what one does.

It is cut out of the budget.

Not in the political word.

In the world of Washington DC this means you spend like hell until the truth catches up with ya.

Obama will spend 9.7 trillion dollars.

Then the idiot ruling class will tell ya that okay now we’ll cut 1.7 trillion dollars over the next ten years.

And this is called spending cuts.

Do the math.

Some how this is called a saving.

In the real world these clowns haven’t done crap to fix the problem.

Instead of cutting spending the elite ruling class are giving Obama a blank check for 9.7 trillion dollars.

This is call insanity.

Insanity means doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results.

If a CEO submitted a budget like this he would be put in jail.




Speaker of the House John Boehner, Harry Reid, the evil Obama and the rest think, “We the American People are stupid.”

We are tired of this shit.

Cut spending means cut spending.

Not fake cuts or Washingtonian gimmicks to make it look like there are cuts being made when in reality the spending and taxes will go through the roof.

November 2012 John Beohner and his ilk will get the full wrath of the American people.

These are Boehner’s exact words on the Rush Limbaugh show.

Well, this agreement was worked out between myself and the bipartisan leadership in the Senate, and it’s a two-step process. It cuts $1.2 trillion from the discretionary portion of the budget over the next ten years and puts spending caps in place that will make sure that that savings actually does, in fact, occur.
It mounts up over time, but in the first year, you know, we’re already spending $38-1/2 less than what we spent last year in that portion of the budget. This will cut another $26 billion out of real outlays going out and about $7 billion in what we call budget authority. Secondly, though, it sets up a joint select committee of the members of Congress: Six members from the House — three Democrats, three Republicans — and six members of the Senate. And they’re charged with finding an additional $1.8 trillion worth of deficit reduction over the balance of this year. And they all meet. Any proposal that gets seven votes out of that group would go into a package where there’s an automatic up-or-down vote in the House and Senate

There really are Democrats who want to cut spending, and I’m confident that our members can go in there and make the case for why America needs to act because the greatest risk to our country is not missing August the 2nd. The greatest risk is that we do not make the cuts necessary to put our financial house in order.
Well, listen, now we’re getting into budget talk. It’s $7 billion in budget authority below the current year. It’s $26 billion below in actual outlays that go out the door — and again, remember, we made big cuts from last year into this year. We’re gonna make more cuts going into next year. When have you ever seen a Congress in that one-third of the budget actually spend less from one year to the next? And we’re gonna do it two years in row, and frankly we might even get to three years in a row.
First, if this bill were to pass, the President could ask for an increase in the debt limit up to 95% of the cuts. Remember one of the principles here: We are not gonna increase the debt limit by anything more than what we’re willing to cut spending. I’ve said the cuts have to exceed it, he’d have to ask for it.
Trillion dollars roughly and will take them probably into February, maybe March

We waited too long to deal with the problem — and when we got 10,000 Baby Boomers like us retiring every day, more money for Social Security, more money for Medicare, it’s just a fact. But I believe that the joint select committee can in fact produce real cuts in spending. But there’s a third part of this, Rush, and that is that it requires the House and Senate to have a vote on a balanced budget amendment after October 1st and before the joint committee would report — and the idea here is twofold. One is to get all of our friends on the same page as to which balanced budget amendment, and secondly, to allow the American people our members and others to put pressure on these liberal members of Congress to step up and to vote for a balanced budget amendment — and, frankly, we need time to build that support because today, I’m not sure it’s there.
That’s the point the President’s making. That’s why he wants a $2.4 trillion blank check today that lets him continue his spending spree. If, in fact, the joint committee does not report the Congress is going to have to act, and we could be right where we are today. But it’s the only way to force the Congress to make the cuts necessary to get our fiscal house in order. Now, I’ll be the first one to tell you, this plan isn’t perfect. Again, it was an agreement between both houses of the Congress.
Well, some people are concerned that the joint committee, “My God, they might raise taxes.” Well, I’m gonna tell you what: It’s gonna be pretty hard for the joint committee to do that. I don’t believe that the Republicans on this committee that get appointed are gonna vote to increase taxes — and if they did, I don’t believe the House of Representatives would approve the report of the joint committee. So I don’t fear that problem — and, frankly, I’m not afraid of the debate. If they want to have that debate, let’s have it.
Let’s separate the two issues, Rush. The debt ceiling is about debts that America has already incurred, obligations that we’ve already made. It’s like you going out and buying something on your credit card. You’re obligated to pay for it, and these debts have already been incurred — and, frankly, I think it’s the moral obligation of our government to meet its debts. Having said that, it is time. If you’re charging more than what you can afford, it’s time to start spending less. What I’m trying to do is set up a scenario with this bill that we’re trying to move through the House to force the Congress to finally act.
Then Congress will have to go through the regular process, which isn’t that hard in the House. It’s much harder in the Senate, and frankly this joint select committee was set up to facilitate a real vote to cut spending in the United States Senate.

This plan is stupid. This plan will send us even faster on fast track to hell.

This is what you get when let John Boehner and his merry band of idiots run the show the destruction of our country.

The add to the mix an evil Marxist Obama, the Democrat Socialist Party, the Left and all the Libs this is a sure concoction that will blow this country smithereens.


Here is a novel idea don’t spend more than you take in.

Ten percent should be saved, ten percent to help the poor, and the rest take care of the bills.

Try it works,.

This is called ECON 101.

The Sixties Radical on The Planned Destruction of The USA by Obama and The Democrat Party

This is not business as usual in Washington DC. This is not the time for timid souls. Our country is on the brink of getting pushed over the cliff into utter destruction by the evil Obama, his mates in the Democrat Socialist Party, the Left, all the Libs in this country, the statists in the Republican Party, and the suck ass state run media.

We don’t have the time to mess around on the edges or in the weeds.
If we don’t stop this runaway freight train headed for over the cliff our nation will be destroyed.

We are broke.

We don’t have the money.

We the People sent a message to the Democrat Socialist Party; the statists in the Republican Party and the evil Prez Obama stop the spending now.

Cut this crap out now.

Yet, the way these clowns are acting in way one would think the election of November 2010 never happened.

These evil people have spread lie after lie.

I call them evil because they know exactly what they are doing.

Obama and his merry evil force are destroying this country on purpose.

This is a hard fact to swallow.

Let’s look at the facts.

Here is a look at the evil Obama’s fiscal record.

This taken from Mark Levin’s website.

Despite newfound concern with the debt overhang stifling economic growth, President Obama’s record falls far short of his rhetoric.  Let’s review the decisions made by President Obama and Congressional Democrats over the past couple of years, and the disappointing results of their policy choices:

January 20, 2009 
President Obama sworn into office

  • President tells the American people in his Inaugural Address: “Those of us who manage the public’s dollars will be held to account, to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day, because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.”
  • Debt Held By Public = $6.31 trillion

February 17, 2009
President Signs into Law the Spending Stimulus

  • The stimulus adds $821 billion in new spending according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
  • The White House promises this infusion of spending and borrowing would keep unemployment rate below 8%.  As millions of Americans are painfully aware, that promise was broken.
  • Debt Held by Public = $6.48 trillion

February 26, 2009
President Issues FY2010 Budget

  • The President’s budget adds $2.7 trillion in new debt in FY2010 and imposes $1.4 trillion in new taxes.
  • Debt Held by Public = $6.58 trillion

March 11, 2009
President Signs FY2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act

  • The massive spending bill includes 8,696 earmarks at a cost of $11 billion.
  • The spending bill adds $19 billion in new spending above the baseline – an 8.6% spending increase.
  • Debt Held by Public = $6.66 trillion

April 29, 2009
Congressional Democrats Pass FY2010 Budget

  • The Congressional Democrats’ budget calls for a $2 trillion debt increase in 2010, and another 8.9% increase in non-defense discretionary spending.
  • The reconciliation process is abused to later pave the way for health care overhaul to be jammed into law.
  • Of note: this is the last time Congressional Democrats will bother budgeting.
  • Of note: this is the last time Congressional Democrats will bother budgeting.
  • Debt Held by Public = $6.85 trillion

February 2, 2010
President Issues FY2011 Budget

  • The President’s budget more than doubles the debt; pushes the FY2011 deficit to a new record of $1.6 trillion; drives spending to a new record of $3.8 trillion in fiscal year 2011; and raises taxes by more than $2 trillion through 2020, under the administration’s own estimates.
  • Debt Held by Public = $7.85 trillion

March 23, 2010
President Signs Health-Care Overhaul Into Law

  • The massive new law adds $1.4 trillion in new spending over the next decade, and over $2.5 trillion once the law is fully implemented.
  • Despite sluggish economic growth and high unemployment, the law imposes over $500 billion in new tax hikes.  CBO Director Elmendorf would later testify that the law would reduce employment by roughly half a percent – a reduction of approximately 800,000 jobs.
  • Debt Held by Public = $8.18 trillion

April 15, 2010 
Congressional Democrats Decide Not to Do a Budget for FY2011 

  • The 1974 Budget Act requires Congress to pass a budget each year by April 15.
  • In an unprecedented budget failure, House Democrats not only failed to pass a budget – they opted to not even propose a budget.
  • Debt Held by Public = $8.39 trillion

July 21, 2010
President Signs Financial Regulatory Overhaul Into Law

  • In addition to heightened regulatory uncertainty, the massive new law adds $10.2 billion in new spending
  • Debt Held by Public = $8.69 trillion

February 14, 2011
President Issues FY2012 Budget

  • The President’s budget yet again calls for the doubling of the debt in five years, and tripling the debt in ten years.
  • The President’s budget spends $47 trillion over the next decade, imposes over $1 trillion in new tax hikes, and fails to address the drivers of the debt.
  • Debt Held by Public = $9.45 trillion

April 13, 2011
President Delivers Speech on Deficit Reduction

  • The President appears to abandon his own budget by offering a ‘framework’ that calls for additional tax increases, defense spending cuts, and Medicare price controls – yet lacks sufficient detail to back-up claims of deficit reduction.
  • Debt Held by Public = $9.65 trillion

July 15, 2011
President Holds Press Conference: “We’re Running Out of Time” to Deal with Debt

  • President Obama tells reporters: “I’ve got reams of paper and printouts and spreadsheets on my desk, and so we know how we can create a package that solves the deficits and debt for a significant period of time.  But in order to do that, we got to get started now.”
  • The American people have still not seen any “paper” or “printouts” of what specific spending cuts the President supports.  The American people have still not seen any “spreadsheets” from the White House to corroborate their claims of having offered a deficit reduction plan.
  • While it’s long past time for Washington “to get started now” on tackling our debt problems, President Obama has still not proposed a credible budget, and Senate Democrats have still not proposed any budget.
  • Debt Held by Public = $9.75 trillion

Any simpleton knows that you can’t spend more money than you take in. If you do you are in the shits.

Yet, Washington DC’s math and economic policies defy logic. These statists want us to believe than we can keep taxing and spending ourselves silly and nothing bad will come from it.

In Washington Dc it is all about smoke and mirrors.

If these people tried these practices in the real world they would all be thrown in jail.

This is called cooking the books.

In plain and simple English making numbers up to hide the real facts of the dire situation we are really in.

If this were true Russia would still be around under the dictatorship of the Communist Party.

These failed economic policies have destroyed Greece, Spain, and Portugal.

The next country to go down the drink will us.

If this happens the rest of the free world is fucked.

This is why we must not let the government increase the debt limited.

If this happens it will be months not years when this country will be thrown into economic chaos.

If this happens what happened in Europe will look like child’s play.

Our founding fathers warned us about these very circumstances.

Thomas Jefferson pushed for a balanced budget amendment in 1798.

Here are some quotes from our founding fathers-

“Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is a necessary evil: in its worst state, an intolerable one.” –Thomas Paine

“Some writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher.” –Thomas Paine, Common Sense, 1776.

“It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.” –Thomas Jefferson

“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” –Thomas Jefferson

“My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.” –Thomas Jefferson

“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” –Thomas Jefferson

And in light of our Washington leaders stated goal of re-inflating the housing bubble: “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.” –Thomas Jefferson

The Sixties Radical on John Boehner Selling Out his Country to The Evil Obama

Once again the conservatives have been given the kachingas. Our own party has sold us down the river. John Boehner is a chicken shit that will do anything to stay in power.

John Boehner had the balls to lie on the Rush Limbaugh show saying that a deal has not been struck.

It may not be in writing but it is 90% done.

You sold this country out.

You have given the evil Prez a lifeline.

Yet this lifeline will kill and destroy this country.

John Boehner is the Speaker of the House because we the people voted the idiots out of office.

We didn’t elect asshole Beohner to Speaker of The House.

Your crony chicken shit Republicans did.

We are not your subjects of King Obama.

This is not a dictatorship.

This is a Constitutional Republic but we would never know it.

Look Boehner you jack ass when you threw King Obama a lifeline in essence you just destroyed our way of life.

This lie is this. The evil one, the lying sack of shit media, The Democrat Socialist Party, The sellout Republicans, John McCain, Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Lindsey Graham, Susan Collins etal are spewing that the country will default if we don’t increase the debt ceiling.

The opposite is true.

We will not default.

We have enough money coming in each month to take care of all of our obligations.

Obama will be the one who is responsible for not paying social security recipients, Military personnel etal not the Republicans.

Yet these good for nothing-chicken shits believe this lie.

When Boehner spread his lies he used the words default on our loans if we don’t increase the debt limit.

Actually these are the evil Obama’s words.

The truth is we are broke.

I am tired of all of this crap.  

John Boehner you are responsible for driving the country over the cliff.

You have given the keys to King Obama to do this.

We don’t have the money.

You can’t spend what you don’t have.

This is basic ECON 101.

Yet all common sense is thrown out the window in the name of progress.

John Boehner you have driven another nail into our countries coffin.

One further question how does one compromise with evil?

When good compromises with evil, evil wins.

We have to take our country back.





The Sixties Radical on Statist Republicans who are Selling on Their Country to Keep Power

I can’t believe this shit. The gang of six is at it again. This time these idiots are about to send this country right to hell with their idiocy.

That’s right cut a deal a with the evil Obama. These clowns believe all the bullshit that is spewed out by the lying sacks of shit in the press, Standard and Poor, Moody’s and the rest.

These people will sell their soul for a buck.

This is a bold face lie.

When the country reaches the debt ceiling we as a country have to payoff the obligations of the bond owners and all of that.

We have enough money to do that each month.

This is the bold face lie the media, The Prez, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, John Coburn, Susan Collins, and the rest of the statists want you to believe.

Here is a definition of statist or statism- Statism (or etatism) is a scholarly term in political philosophy either emphasising the role of the state in analysing political change; or, in describing political movements which support the use of the state to achieve goals.

When used to describe analyses, statism refers to analyses that use a dichotomy between state and society, with the state viewed as a homogeneous institution capable of using political power to enact policy on a passive or resisting society composed of the body of people. Such an analysis, dependent on the elitist theory of power, is contested by those who prefer the pluralist theory of power which contends that power is exercised by individuals and competing organisations within society.[1][2]

Economic statism (dirigisme), for instance, promotes the view that the state has a major and legitimate role in directing the economy, either directly through state-owned enterprises and other types of machinery of government, or indirectly through economic planning.[3][4] It may refer to the ideology of statism that holds that:

Sovereignty is vested not in the people but in the national state, and that all individuals and associations exist only to enhance the power, the prestige, and the well-being of the state. The concept of statism, which is seen as synonymous with the concept of nation, and corporatism repudiates individualism and exalts the nation as an organic body headed by the Supreme Leader and nurtured by unity, force, and discipline.[5]

The term statism is sometimes used to refer to state capitalism or highly-regulated market economies with large amounts of government intervention. It is also used to refer to state socialism or co-operative economic systems that use the state, through nationalization, as a means of running industry.


This is what these evil people are doing to this free country of ours. They want to set themselves up as the ruling class.

Now the gang of six lead by John McCain wanta be- Republican Senator from Oklahoma John Coburn, Joe Lieberman Senator Connecticut, Susan Collins, Maine just to name a few are doing.

These idiots have to go.

Colburn etal you are selling out this country.

If this country continues down this path we are doomed.



Obama is a Marxists.

You want to give him what! To do what! Are you freakin nuts?

Shut it the %%$$## down.

Let’s restore some sanity to our Marxist spending ways.

We the People have too much on our backs.

What do you want every penny we make to so you can give it away to the Democrat Socialist Party, and the Republican Party to spend on their special interests.

Oh, Yeah, that’s the plan.

This is called stealing.

Here is some food for thought.

What is happening in the good old USA is not a new idea. These ideas have been around since the dawn of man.

Jean Jacques Rousseau wrote these words in 1762.

I WARN the reader that this chapter requires careful reading, and that I am unable to make myself clear to those who refuse to be attentive. Every free action is produced by the concurrence of two causes; one moral, i.e., the will which determines the act; the other physical, i.e., the power which executes it. When I walk towards an object, it is necessary first that I should will to go there, and, in the second place, that my feet should carry me. If a paralytic wills to run and an active man wills not to, they will both stay where they are. The body politic has the same motive powers; here too force and will are distinguished, will under the name of legislative power and force under that of executive power. Without their concurrence, nothing is, or should be, done.

We have seen that the legislative power belongs to the people, and can belong to it alone. It may, on the other hand, readily be seen, from the principles laid down above, that the executive power cannot belong to the generality as legislature or Sovereign, because it consists wholly of particular acts which fall outside the competency of the law, and consequently of the Sovereign, whose acts must always be laws.

The public force therefore needs an agent of its own to bind it together and set it to work under the direction of the general will, to serve as a means of communication between the State and the Sovereign, and to do for the collective person more or less what the union of soul and body does for man. Here we have what is, in the State, the basis of government, often wrongly confused with the Sovereign, whose minister it is.

What then is government? An intermediate body set up between the subjects and the Sovereign, to secure their mutual correspondence, charged with the execution of the laws and the maintenance of liberty, both civil and political.

The members of this body are called magistrates or kings, that is to say governors, and the whole body bears the name prince.18 Thus those who hold that the act, by which a people puts itself under a prince, is not a contract, are certainly right. It is simply and solely a commission, an employment, in which the rulers, mere officials of the Sovereign, exercise in their own name the power of which it makes them depositaries. This power it can limit, modify or recover at pleasure; for the alienation of such a right is incompatible with the nature of the social body, and contrary to the end of association.

I call then government, or supreme administration, the legitimate exercise of the executive power, and prince or magistrate the man or the body entrusted with that administration.

In government reside the intermediate forces whose relations make up that of the whole to the whole, or of the Sovereign to the State. This last relation may be represented as that between the extreme terms of a continuous proportion, which has government as its mean proportional. The government gets from the Sovereign the orders it gives the people, and, for the State to be properly balanced, there must, when everything is reckoned in, be equality between the product or power of the government taken in itself, and the product or power of the citizens, who are on the one hand sovereign and on the other subject.

Furthermore, none of these three terms can be altered without the equality being instantly destroyed. If the Sovereign desires to govern, or the magistrate to give laws, or if the subjects refuse to obey, disorder takes the place of regularity, force and will no longer act together, and the State is dissolved and falls into despotism or anarchy. Lastly, as there is only one mean proportional between each relation, there is also only one good government possible for a State. But, as countless events may change the relations of a people, not only may different governments be good for different peoples, but also for the same people at different times.

In attempting to give some idea of the various relations that may hold between these two extreme terms, I shall take as an example the number of a people, which is the most easily expressible.

Suppose the State is composed of ten thousand citizens. The Sovereign can only be considered collectively and as a body; but each member, as being a subject, is regarded as an individual: thus the Sovereign is to the subject as ten thousand to one, i.e., each member of the State has as his share only a ten-thousandth part of the sovereign authority, although he is wholly under its control. If the people numbers a hundred thousand, the condition of the subject undergoes no change, and each equally is under the whole authority of the laws, while his vote, being reduced to a hundred-thousandth part, has ten times less influence in drawing them up. The subject therefore remaining always a unit, the relation between him and the Sovereign increases with the number of the citizens. From this it follows that, the larger the State, the less the liberty.

When I say the relation increases, I mean that it grows more unequal. Thus the greater it is in the geometrical sense, the less relation there is in the ordinary sense of the word. In the former sense, the relation, considered according to quantity, is expressed by the quotient; in the latter, considered according to identity, it is reckoned by similarity.

Now, the less relation the particular wills have to the general will, that is, morals and manners to laws, the more should the repressive force be increased. The government, then, to be good, should be proportionately stronger as the people is more numerous.

On the other hand, as the growth of the State gives the depositaries of the public authority more temptations and chances of abusing their power, the greater the force with which the government ought to be endowed for keeping the people in hand, the greater too should be the force at the disposal of the Sovereign for keeping the government in hand. I am speaking, not of absolute force, but of the relative force of the different parts of the State.

It follows from this double relation that the continuous proportion between the Sovereign, the prince and the people, is by no means an arbitrary idea, but a necessary consequence of the nature of the body politic. It follows further that, one of the extreme terms, viz., the people, as subject, being fixed and represented by unity, whenever the duplicate ratio increases or diminishes, the simple ratio does the same, and is changed accordingly. From this we see that there is not a single unique and absolute form of government, but as many governments differing in nature as there are States differing in size.

If, ridiculing this system, any one were to say that, in order to find the mean proportional and give form to the body of the government, it is only necessary, according to me, to find the square root of the number of the people, I should answer that I am here taking this number only as an instance; that the relations of which I am speaking are not measured by the number of men alone, but generally by the amount of action, which is a combination of a multitude of causes; and that, further, if, to save words, I borrow for a moment the terms of geometry, I am none the less well aware that moral quantities do not allow of geometrical accuracy.

The government is on a small scale what the body politic which includes it is on a great one. It is a moral person endowed with certain faculties, active like the Sovereign and passive like the State, and capable of being resolved into other similar relations. This accordingly gives rise to a new proportion, within which there is yet another, according to the arrangement of the magistracies, till an indivisible middle term is reached, i.e., a single ruler or supreme magistrate, who may be represented, in the midst of this progression, as the unity between the fractional and the ordinal series.

Without encumbering ourselves with this multiplication of terms, let us rest content with regarding government as a new body within the State, distinct from the people and the Sovereign, and intermediate between them.

There is between these two bodies this essential difference, that the State exists by itself, and the government only through the Sovereign. Thus the dominant will of the prince is, or should be, nothing but the general will or the law; his force is only the public force concentrated in his hands, and, as soon as he tries to base any absolute and independent act on his own authority, the tie that binds the whole together begins to be loosened. If finally the prince should come to have a particular will more active than the will of the Sovereign, and should employ the public force in his hands in obedience to this particular will, there would be, so to speak, two Sovereigns, one rightful and the other actual, the social union would evaporate instantly, and the body politic would be dissolved.

However, in order that the government may have a true existence and a real life distinguishing it from the body of the State, and in order that all its members may be able to act in concert and fulfil the end for which it was set up, it must have a particular personality, a sensibility common to its members, and a force and will of its own making for its preservation. This particular existence implies assemblies, councils, power and deliberation and decision, rights, titles, and privileges belonging exclusively to the prince and making the office of magistrate more honourable in proportion as it is more troublesome. The difficulties lie in the manner of so ordering this subordinate whole within the whole, that it in no way alters the general constitution by affirmation of its own, and always distinguishes the particular force it possesses, which is destined to aid in its preservation, from the public force, which is destined to the preservation of the State; and, in a word, is always ready to sacrifice the government to the people, and never to sacrifice the people to the government.

Furthermore, although the artificial body of the government is the work of another artificial body, and has, we may say, only a borrowed and subordinate life, this does not prevent it from being able to act with more or less vigour or promptitude, or from being, so to speak, in more or less robust health. Finally, without departing directly from the end for which it was instituted, it may deviate more or less from it, according to the manner of its constitution.

From all these differences arise the various relations which the government ought to bear to the body of the State, according to the accidental and particular relations by which the State itself is modified, for often the government that is best in itself will become the most pernicious, if the relations in which it stands have altered according to the defects of the body politic to which it belongs.

Thank God our founding fathers rejected this drivel.


Rousseau went on to write-



HE who makes the law knows better than any one else how it should be executed and interpreted. It seems then impossible to have a better constitution than that in which the executive and legislative powers are united; but this very fact renders the government in certain respects inadequate, because things which should be distinguished are confounded, and the prince and the Sovereign, being the same person, form, so to speak, no more than a government without government.

It is not good for him who makes the laws to execute them, or for the body of the people to turn its attention away from a general standpoint and devote it to particular objects. Nothing is more dangerous than the influence of private interests in public affairs, and the abuse of the laws by the government is a less evil than the corruption of the legislator, which is the inevitable sequel to a particular standpoint. In such a case, the State being altered in substance, all reformation becomes impossible, A people that would never misuse governmental powers would never misuse independence; a people that would always govern well would not need to be governed.

If we take the term in the strict sense, there never has been a real democracy, and there never will be. It is against the natural order for the many to govern and the few to be governed. It is unimaginable that the people should remain continually assembled to devote their time to public affairs, and it is clear that they cannot set up commissions for that purpose without the form of administration being changed.

In fact, I can confidently lay down as a principle that, when the functions of government are shared by several tribunals, the less numerous sooner or later acquire the greatest authority, if only because they are in a position to expedite affairs, and power thus naturally comes into their hands.

Besides, how many conditions that are difficult to unite does such a government presuppose! First, a very small State, where the people can readily be got together and where each citizen can with ease know all the rest; secondly, great simplicity of manners, to prevent business from multiplying and raising thorny problems; next, a large measure of equality in rank and fortune, without which equality of rights and authority cannot long subsist; lastly, little or no luxury — for luxury either comes of riches or makes them necessary; it corrupts at once rich and poor, the rich by possession and the poor by covetousness; it sells the country to softness and vanity, and takes away from the State all its citizens, to make them slaves one to another, and one and all to public opinion.

This is why a famous writer has made virtue the fundamental principle of Republics;E1 for all these conditions could not exist without virtue. But, for want of the necessary distinctions, that great thinker was often inexact, and sometimes obscure, and did not see that, the sovereign authority being everywhere the same, the same principle should be found in every well-constituted State, in a greater or less degree, it is true, according to the form of the government.

It may be added that there is no government so subject to civil wars and intestine agitations as democratic or popular government, because there is none which has so strong and continual a tendency to change to another form, or which demands more vigilance and courage for its maintenance as it is. Under such a constitution above all, the citizen should arm himself with strength and constancy, and say, every day of his life, what a virtuous Count Palatine19 said in the Diet of Poland: Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium.20

Were there a people of gods, their government would be democratic. So perfect a government is not for men.

This what the evil Obama and his minions believe.

If “We The People” don’t stand up to this evil man we will lose our freedom.






The Sixties Radical