Very few people get what is really going on with the Prez and his merry band of destroyers. Many in the media, Republicans, professional politicians, and other so-called pundits can’t see the truth if it bit them in the butt.
There are only three people who truly understand the diabolical nature of Prez Obama and his accomplices in the democrat party, the state run media, and Rhino Republicans of what he is doing to this country.
Rush Limbaugh, Pastor John Hagee, and Mark Levin know the real truth.
Rush has been warning us of this evil man since his rise to power began almost three years ago.
Obama is a Muslim.
Obama is a Marxist.
Check that he is worse than a Marxist.
Obama wants to set himself up as the God of us all.
He is not stupid.
Obama knows exactly what he is doing.
This is a well thought coldly calculated plan to destroy the very fabric of this county.
Obama’s teachers are his Marxist father, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Saul Alinski, and Chicago style politics.
This is all about obtaining power and keeping it.
Obama is worse than evil.
Obama must not only be stopped but also destroyed.
He doesn’t care what other people think.
The objective is the only thing he cares about.
Rush hit the nail on the head when he spoke about this on his Thursday and Friday shows October 7th & 8th.
The rise to power of this man is directly tied to this date June 17th, 1963. This is when the Supreme Court declared school prayer unconstitutional.
The Court ruled 8-1 to stop school prayer.
The only dissenting vote was Potter Stewart.
William Brennan said why he was in favor of stopping school prayer.
Whatever Jefferson or Madison would have thought of Bible reading or the recital of the Lord’s Prayer in … public schools …, our use of the history … must limit itself to broad purposes, not specific practices. … [T]he Baltimore and Abbington schools offend the First Amendment because they sufficiently threaten in our day those substantive evils the fear of which called forth the Establishment Clause. … [O]ur interpretation of the First Amendment must necessarily be responsive to the much more highly charged nature of religious questions in contemporary society. A too literal quest for the advice of the Founding Fathers upon the issues of these cases seems to me futile and misdirected—Davis (1991), p.
Justice Brennan further added- There are persons in every community—often deeply devout—to whom any version of the Judaeo-Christian Bible is offensive. There are others whose reverence for the Holy Scriptures demands private study or reflection and to whom public reading or recitation is sacrilegious…. To such persons it is not the fact of using the Bible in the public schools, nor the content of any particular version, that is offensive, but the manner in which it is used.
Justic Potter the only dissenting vote said this- declared the cases consolidated with Schempp as “so fundamentally deficient as to make impossible an informed or responsible determination of the constitutional issues presented”—specifically, of whether the Establishment Clause was violated. As to the intent and scope of the religion clauses of the First Amendment: It is, I think, a fallacious oversimplification to regard the [religion clauses] as establishing a single constitutional standard of “separation of church and state”, which can be applied in every case to delineate the required boundaries between government and religion…. As a matter of history, the First Amendment was adopted solely as a limitation upon the newly created National Government. The events leading to its adoption strongly suggest that the Establishment Clause was primarily an attempt to insure that Congress not only would be powerless to establish a national church, but would also be unable to interfere with existing state establishments. … So matters stood until the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, or more accurately, until this Court’s decision in Cantwell….
Justice Potter further added-If religious exercises are held to be an impermissible activity in schools, religion is placed in an artificial and state-created disadvantage…. And a refusal to permit religious exercises thus is seen, not as the realization of state neutrality, but rather as the establishment of a religion of secularism, or at least, as governmental support of the beliefs of those who think that religious exercises should be conducted only in private (Eastland, 1993, pp. 165).
Our Founding Fathers have said this about the God of the Bible and Jesus.
All eyes are opened, or opening, to the rights of man. The general spread of the light of science has already laid open to every view the palpable truth, that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride legitimately, by the grace of God.
Thomas Jefferson, letter to Roger C. Weightman, June 24, 1826
And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever.
Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia, Query 18, 1781
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between church and State.
Thomas Jefferson, letter to a Committee of the Danbury Baptist Association, Connecticut, January 1, 1802
I now make it my earnest prayer, that God would have you, and the State over which you preside, in his holy protection, that he would incline the hearts of the Citizens to cultivate a spirit of subordination and obedience to Government, to entertain a brotherly affection and love for one another, for their fellow Citizens of the United States at large, and particularly for their brethren who have served in the Field, and finally, that he would most graciously be pleased to dispose us all, to do Justice, to love mercy, and to demean ourselves with that Charity, humility and pacific temper of mind, which were the Characteristicks of the Divine Author of our blessed Religion, and without an humble imitation of whose example in these things, we can never hope to be a happy Nation.
George Washington, circular letter of farewell to the Army, June 8, 17
Ponder on these writings for a while.
All of our problems are directly related to when we kicked God of the Bible out of our country in 1963.
This is a simple truth.
It is true.