Tag Archives: Immigration

The Sixties Radical- The Day of Adonai’ s Final Judgement is Close


Led by John Boehner and  the Republicans in the House will cave and give amnesty to illegals. When this happens our borders will be open and anyone can come in anytime they want. The rule of law is useless. The Constitution is nothing more than a piece of paper. The ideas of freedom, liberty, and we are the sovereign in this Adonai inspired document The Constitution means nao serve para nada and will be dead forever.

Both the Republicans and Democrats have signed the final death knell of my country. The Republican Party wing of the Demo-Republican Party is dead. We have now committed suicide by own hand. Paul Ryan was once a conservative now he is just another shill that has sold out his soul to the highest bidder. Dittos for Marco Rubio as well who is another liar in a long line of liars in the Republican wing of the Demo Republican Party.

We could all see this coming a mile away. When Adonai of the Torah and Tanakh is kicked out lawlessness reigns supreme.  We are now in the final stages of this country, as we know it. We have now have driven ourselves over the cliff to our death.

Adonai will use this sad day to HIS benefit. This is just another signal and sign that the day of Judgement is coming. Yeshua will soon return to get HIS people. My people Israel The Jews will know and understand that Yeshua is our King and Saviour. All of Adonai’s people will rejoice as the King approaches for the final battle with Satan.

The sad story for all of those who do not believe in Adonai’s word and my saviour Yeshua is that WE WIN! Yeshua will rule for one thousand years.

It is time for Adonai’s people to stand up and fight for our rights. Prayer and fasting is the key. Adonai will protect HIS people. The time is close at hand when the Adonai’s word and Yeshua will be branded as hate speech. This day is later than you think.

My people The Jews Israel are in great danger. Our enemies are gathering and joining forces with Russia to attack and destroy Israel. Ezekiel chapters 38-39 prophesied this. Adonai would lead our enemies into the valley of dry bones and they will be destroyed.

These events are happening at a rapid pace.

The Drudge Report January 30th filed this story by Ann Coulter As House Republicans prepare to sell out the country on immigration this week, Phyllis Schlafly has produced a stunning report on how immigration is changing the country. The report is still embargoed, but someone slipped me a copy, and it’s too important to wait.

Leave aside the harm cheap labor being dumped on the country does to the millions of unemployed Americans. What does it mean for the Republican Party?

Citing surveys from the Pew Research Center, the Pew Hispanic Center, Gallup, NBC News, Harris polling, the Annenberg Policy Center, Latino Decisions, the Center for Immigration Studies and the Hudson Institute, Schlafly’s report overwhelmingly demonstrates that merely continuing our current immigration policies spells doom for the Republican Party.
Immigrants — all immigrants — have always been the bulwark of the Democratic Party. For one thing, recent arrivals tend to be poor and in need of government assistance. Also, they’re coming from societies that are far more left-wing than our own. History shows that, rather than fleeing those policies, they bring their cultures with them. (Look at what New Yorkers did to Vermont.)

This is not a secret. For at least a century, there’s never been a period when a majority of immigrants weren’t Democrats.

At the current accelerated rate of immigration — 1.1 million new immigrants every year — Republicans will be a fringe party in about a decade.
Thanks to endless polling, we have a pretty good idea of what most immigrants believe.

According to a Harris poll, 81 percent of native-born citizens think the schools should teach students to be proud of being American. Only 50 percent of naturalized U.S. citizens do.
While 67 percent of native-born Americans believe our Constitution is a higher legal authority than international law, only 37 percent of naturalized citizens agree.

No wonder they vote 2-1 for the Democrats..

The two largest immigrant groups, Hispanics and Asians, have little in common economically, culturally or historically. But they both overwhelmingly support big government, Obamacare, affirmative action and gun control.

According the 2012 National Asian American Survey, as well as a Kaiser Foundation poll, only 40 percent of the general public holds a favorable opinion of Obamacare, 42 percent unfavorable. Meanwhile, 51 percent of Asians have a favorable opinion of Obamacare, 18 percent an unfavorable one. Even Koreans support Obamacare by 57 percent to 17 percent.
Overall, 69 percent of immigrants like Obamacare, according to a 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study.

That same survey showed that only 35 percent of native-born Americans support affirmative action, compared to 58 percent of immigrants, including — amazingly — 64 percent of Asians (suggesting they may not be as smart as everyone thinks).

Also surprising, a Pew Research Center poll of all Hispanics, immigrant and citizen alike, found that Hispanics take a dimmer view of capitalism than even people who describe themselves as “liberal Democrats.” While 47 percent of self-described “liberal Democrats” hold a negative view of capitalism, 55 percent of Hispanics do.

Pew also found that only 27 percent of Hispanics support gun rights, compared to 57 percent of non-Hispanic whites. According to Latino Decisions, large majorities of Hispanics favor a national database of gun owners, limiting the capacity of magazines and a ban on semiautomatic weapons.

Seventy-five percent of Hispanic immigrants and 55 percent of Asian immigrants support bigger government — also according to Pew. Even after three generations in America, Hispanics still support bigger government 55 percent to 36 percent, compared to the general public, which opposes bigger government 48 percent to 41 percent.

How are Republicans going to square that circle? It’s not their position on amnesty that immigrants don’t like; it’s Republicans’ support for small government, gun rights, patriotism, the Constitution and capitalism.

Reading these statistics, does anyone wonder why Democrats think vastly increasing immigration should be the nation’s No. 1 priority?
It would be one thing if the people with these views already lived here. Republicans would have no right to say, “You can’t vote.” But why on Earth are they bringing in people sworn to their political destruction?
Republicans have no obligation to assist the Democrats as they change the country in a way that favors them electorally, particularly when it does great harm to the people already here.

Yes, it’s great for the most powerful Americans to have lots of cheap, unskilled labor. Immigration definitely solves the rich’s “servant problem.”
(Approximately 5 million times a day, MSNBC expresses bewilderment that any Republicans oppose amnesty when it’s supported by the Chamber of Commerce. Wow! So even people who profit by flooding the country with cheap labor are in favor of flooding the country with cheap labor!)

It’s terrific for ethnic lobbyists whose political clout will skyrocket the more foreign-born Americans we have.

And it’s fantastic for the Democrats, who are well on their way to a permanent majority, so they can completely destroy the last remnants of what was once known as “the land of the free.”

The only ones opposed to our current immigration policies are the people.
But are they going to give John Boehner a job when he’s no longer House speaker, as some big business lobbyist will?

Will they help Marco Rubio run for president on the claim that, as a Cuban, he can appeal to Hispanics? (Fat chance.)

Will they bundle contributions for Eric Cantor’s re-election, as well-heeled donors will?

Will they be enough to re-elect Kevin McCarthy to Congress so he can keep his gold-plated government health insurance?

Will they be the ones writing Darrell Issa’s flattering New York Times obituary?

Sorry, Americans. You lose.


Adonai is telling us to stop and think about what we are doing! Change and then return to my word for the day of judgement is at hand. Adonai has spoken.

The Sixties Radical-Repent The Kingdom of Yeshua is at hand


Our entire country is turned upside down and on its head. Wrong has become right and right has become wrong. The rule of law is now passé. Our leaders are telling us that illegals now should be given amnesty. Those who break the law are now rewarded for their actions. This is insanity. Yet this is what happens when Adonai is removed from society all hell breaks loose in the name of progress. Lawlessness is the rule of law.

The Drudge Report filed this story from CNSNEWS – “Speaking at the United States Conference of Mayors on Friday, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said the approximately 11 million people who are in the country illegally have “earned the right to be citizens.” “An earned path to citizenship for those currently present in this country is a matter of, in my view, homeland security to encourage people to come out from the shadows,” said Johnson, in what he remarked was one of his first public speeches since being confirmed as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) chief in December.“It is also, frankly, in my judgment, a matter of who we are as Americans,” he said, “to offer the opportunity to those who want to be citizens, who’ve earned the right to be citizens, who are present in this country–many of whom came here as children–to have the opportunity that we all have to try to become American citizens.

Johnson, who had earlier served as general counsel for the Department of Defense under Obama from 2009 to 2012, told the more than 270 mayors in attendance that enforcing immigration law was one of the main missions of DHS.“The five core missions of the Department of Homeland Security are guarding against terrorism, securing our borders, enforcing our nation’s immigration laws, safeguarding cyberspace and critical infrastructure in partnership with the private sector, and supporting emergency preparedness and response efforts at every level,” Johnson said. Then he concluded his remarks by calling for “comprehensive, common sense, immigration reform.” “Common sense immigration reform is supported by the U.S. Conference of Mayors, businesses, and if the polls (are) to be believed, the majority of the American people,” Johnson said. “Border security is inseparable from homeland security.” “And border security must and should be part of comprehensive immigration reform – protecting our borders, securing our ports, promoting the lawful flow of trade and travel through our ports to cities and other communities,” he said. Johnson touted the alleged improvement in border security over the last four years and said comprehensive immigration reform also would increase that security.

“Comprehensive immigration reform would also promote a more effective and efficient system for enforcing our immigration laws, and should include an earned path to citizenship for the approximately 11-and-a-half-million undocumented immigrants present in this country, something like 86% of whom have been here almost 10 years,” Johnson said.“An earned path to citizenship for those currently present in this country is a matter of, in my view, homeland security to encourage people to come out from the shadows, to be accountable, to participate in the American experience, the American society,” he said.


This is the lie told by the Left, Obama, and the elites in society. They want to change the landscape of this country forever. These folks are pushing for open borders and anything goes. Only in America is where illegals are given cart blanc. The illegals are bowed down to and given the full rights of citizenship over those who are born in this country by the elites and those in power. Illegals are noble while America citizens are kicked in teeth and we are called evil by Obama, the Demo-Republican Party and the state-run and state controlled media. When one stands for the rule of law they are branded a bigot, homophobe, racist and anti Latin American or Mexican.

This goes and in hand with the entire global warming hoax. The false unemployment numbers, job creation and job growth as well the lie that we are not broke. This house of cards is about to crumble.

Adonai is warning us to stop this craziness. HE is asking us repent- which means to think and then change our mind, our actions and then return to Adonai’s word.

The only thing that is going to save us is prayer, fasting, and shout out praise to the Yeshua. Once we seek Adonai the answers will come. This is a Torah and Tanakh fact.

We have brought this upon our selves. The time is now to repent for the kingdom of Adonai is at hand.

This goes too for my people Israel and the Jews. Ariel Sharon knew that all the answers came from the Torah. This is why this great man studied Adonai’s word. He studied David’s battle plans laid out in the Torah.

Ariel Sharon was man of Adonai. Yes he pissed people off. He did some crazy things but I think he did this show the world the real nature and truth about our enemies. Sharon knew about the prophecies of Ezekiel. He said keep an eye on Russia.

Before it news filed this story. “Former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon, who was at the height of his power when he suffered a stroke in 2006 and fell into an irreversible coma, died Saturday at the age of 85.

He died at the Tel Hashomer hospital just outside Tel Aviv, with his family at his bedside. Sharon’s son, Gilad Sharon, announced his death Saturday afternoon outside the hospital where he was being treated. “He has gone. He went when he decided to go,” he said.

Ariel Sharon was a renowned warrior, champion of Jewish settlements, and a strong advocate of freedom. His career spanned the history of Israel from its establishment in 1948.

I want to remind you of a prophecy given by the late Rabbi Yitzhak Kaduri. Who stated—on his death bed– that the Messiah, Jesus, had visited him and that He would return to Israel shortly after the death of Ariel Sharon. Is that time now??

We are at that critical moment! Could it be that Jesus is coming soon? Is he really at the door as Rabbi Kaduri prophesied last year? Will the Ariel Sharons death herald in the rapture of the Church?


Adonai has spoken.

The Sixties Radical- Our Days are Numbered Unless We Repent as a Nation

Lawless is now the norm for my country. We have the evil Obama, the evil Senators such as Chuck Schumer, Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Marco Rubio, John McCain, Congress, John Boehner, Eric Cantor, and Paul Ryan, directly defying the will of We The People and Adonai of the Torah and Tanakh by ramming through amnesty for illegals. This is an in you face screw you. We are your rulers. You are the subjects. We have all the power. The Federal government is sovereign not “We The People.” To hell with the rule of law we’ll make it up as we go. Screw the Constitution and The Bill of Rights we will do what the heck we want and you can’t stop us. We are god. Not Adonai of The Torah and The Tanakh.

The fix is in. Harry Reid now has the votes to pass the travesty of bill called amnesty. Amnesty is now the rule of the land. The fake amendment to secure the border is just window dressing to give cover to the chicken shit Republicans like Marco in your face and liar Rubio and the gang of eight who want to forever destroy this country for their own political gain.

The fake opposition to this poison pill called amnesty is just that a bunch of noise signifying nothing.

It is all about power to squash the conservatives, the men and women of Adonai and kill us off once and for all. The diabolical Marco Rubio uses the word of Adonai to silence us. Rubio like Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the Catholics in Congress are shills for hypocrisy and the lies told by the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church is evil. The Pope thinks he is god when in fact he is nothing more than a man.

Please show me in the Tanakh where it states the Pope is the Vicar of Christ.

I am mad as hell. This bull crap has to stop. We are committing suicide on the installment plan.  Yet no one wants to stop this insanity.  We The People” see what is going on but we are branded by the lair and fraud Rubio, the evil Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and the entire Demo-Republican Party, the state run and state controlled media and the Left as anti immigrant, anti-Latino because we stand up for the rule of law, The Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and the word of Adonai.

Every country on earth has a right to say who can and can’t enter their country except the USA. What bunch of bull. We treat illegals better than where they came from.

The evil Rubio and Obama, tells us lie after lie as well as the entire Demo-Republican Party the system is broke. Illegals must come out of the shadows and the only way for this to happen is to give them amnesty. This is pure lunacy.

The reason the system is broke- THE LAWS OF IMMIGRATION AND BORDER SECURITY IS NOT ENFORCED. And whose fault is it. Try Reid, Schumer, the evil Obama, Both Bush’s, Bill Clinton, Congress and the Supreme Court.

What is broke is Congress, the office of the presidency, and the Supreme Court.

We are asked to believe the folks who caused this mess will all of sudden fix it with a bigger and better amnesty bill.  More bloated government, more regulations, more fake triggers, and more ramming down the jack boot of tyranny on our throats to force us to become the subjects not the sovereign.

The reason why this lawlessness is running amuck can be traced to one simple yet quiet act The Engel verses Vitale case that went before the Supreme Court. Warren Court ruled school prayer was unconstitutional in 1962. From that time on Adonai told us “I am outta here, Bye you are on your on now. I will no longer bless you with my grace and protection.”

Since 1962 my country has been on a downhill slide to hell. This 1962 ruling by the Warren court signed our death warrant.

The seeds of our destruction on the installment plan began in 1890 with Woodrow Wilson. Franklin Roosevelt speeded up the process from 1929 through 1945. Lyndon Johnson put it on the fast track. The evil Obama is now driving the final fatal stake into the heart of USA. Congress, The Supreme Court, the state controlled media and state run media, The Left, The Catholic Church, many in the Evangelical Church, most Protestant churches, and by many Jews cheer Obama on to kill us off.

I can count on three fingers the men and women of Congress who are honourable. I can count one hand the Christian ministers who speak out against this tyranny and destruction of the USA.

Only three brave men in the media speak out about the death spiral my country is in- Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Mark Levin.

The first state to collapse will be California. The USA will follow shortly after.

A nation or people cannot openly defy the word of Adonai and HIS laws of nature and economics.

We are morally and spiritually bankrupt. The only way to stop this suicide pack with Satan is prayer and then repent our evil ways. Repent means to change our mind and think about what we are doing and then change our actions.

If we don’t repent we will be destroyed. Adonai has spoken.

The Sixties Radical- It is Later Than You Than for The Destruction of The USA

This country is in grave danger. The fatal blow to knock us out of the box is later than you think. We have so called leaders who think and act like they are the President and Senators of the illegals. These fools think we the citizens of this country legal ones who built this country out of nothing into the greatest country on earth are the real problem and here illegitimately. Our families came from Europe, Asia, The Middle East, Mexico and Latin and South America legally.


Marco Rubio is lair and a fraud and he speaks out of both sides of his mouth. He just like the Arabs who speak peace in English and then tell the Arab speaking world we must wipe all my People the Jews off the face of the earth. Rubio tells the Spanish-speaking people amnesty is a must. Rubio tells the English-speaking crowd that border security must happen first, and then the illegals must pay fines and all kinds of other bull crap if they want to gain citizenship. Hey Rubio which of these statements are the truth?  Your real intentions are spoken in Spanish.

We know who you are. We know your real intentions. You want to destroy this country. You are the Senator of the United States not Mexico, Latin and South America or Cuba. You are telling us we are the second-class citizens.

Hey we built this country with our hard work. Our founding fathers knew and believed that all sovereignty comes from Adonai.  Ben Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, and George Washington just to name a few of these men of faith turned to Adonai and asked Him to guide and protect us. This is why we have prospered.

Please don’t quote the Torah and The Tanakh to use the word of Adonai against the people who are standing up for the rule of law and our Adonai given right to govern this country.

Rubio is just another liar in a long line of lairs that speak falsely so that this country will be destroyed. If you want facts here are some for you.  The first lie began with Ted Kennedy and the Democrats pushing amnesty. This was called the 1965 Hart Cellar Act. The next amnesty came in 1986- The Simpson Mazzoli Act and now it’s the gang of eight-amnesty bill. What has changed? Nothing.

It’s all the same players. Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Chuck Schumer need I say any more.

If you want one party rule then you have it. This will surely be a one-way ticket to hell. The Republican wing of the Demo-Republican will die.  You will never get elected dogcatcher.

What does the Republican wing of the Demo-Republican Party stand for?  (I borrowed this from Mark Levin)

What is the difference between the Demos and Republicans?  Nothing! One is instant destruction. The other is destruction on the installment plan. In both cases we all wind up in the same pace.

Rubio have just signed the death knell of this country.  But this is only part of the truth. The real downhill slide to hell began in 1890 when Woodrow Wilson began to push for Ameritopia (Mark Levin’s book) I suggest you read it Rubio.

The final push over the edge happened in 1963-64 when the Warren Supreme Court abolished school prayer. This one simple yet quiet act pushed this country on a fast tract to hell.

Adonai is warning us repent. This means change your mind, think and change your actions and turn back to me Adonai- Yeshua.

Adonai is warning us yet no one is listening. The Family has been destroyed. Our morals and values based on the Torah and the Tanakh haven been stomped on. Education is now a joke. It is about brain washing. The last to go is the economics. This is all about blowout of the water. Try 120 trillion dollars in debt.

We can’t change the word of Adonai and the laws of nature and economics.

Changing leaders will not do a damn thing. Prayer and asking Adonai and Yeshua for forgiveness is our only answer.

Adonai has spoken. The Day of Judgment is at hand.

Adonai’s design for us will always win out. We can’t run from the word of Adonai and Yeshua.

The Sixties Radical-Adonai is Warning Us It is Time to Repent and Change If Not We Will Be Destroyed

The USA as we know it is now on its last legs. The crap we’ve been getting away with for years is now coming how to roost. Abortion, giving Adonai the middle finger and our unrighteous living, total disregard for the Ten Commandments, the throwing away of the Constitution and Bill of Rights and the turning of our backs on the Adonai of the Torah and Tanakh and Yeshua is now the new morals of the land.

Doing this bullshit always catches up with ya. The seeds of our mass suicide on the installment plan began in 1890 with Woodrow Wilson and it this has come full circle with Obama.

Adonai has been warning us for years, “Hey folks you better stop doing what you are doing or I will give you the wrath of my judgment for your unholy living.”

All of this is now coming to a head. Adonai has unmasked the real intentions of the evil Obama, the Left, The Democrat wing of the Demo-Republican Party, the statists, our leaders, and the state run and state controlled media.  The truth has been unmasked yet a majority of Americans refuse to see the truth of our dire predicament.

Voting the bums outta office and changing leaders will not do a damn thing. Yes, this might slow down the rate of attrition and slowly stop the hemorrhaging but this will not stop the death knell that is tolling for the USA.

Let me be very blunt about the situation. The only way we can change the direction of this country is to get down on our knees and ask Adonai and Yeshua for forgiveness of our sins.  Adonai is screaming out please get down on your knees and ask me to forgive you and I will once again bestow all my blessings and grace upon you and your nation.

Adonai is very clear what will happen to a nation that goes against HIS word. Look at Rome, Greece, Babylonia, and my people Israel and what happened to them. My people the Jews have a covenant with Adonai and yet HE scattered all us all over the face of the earth only to return to the land Adonai gave us in 1948.

Adonai loves us and this is why HE sent HIS son Yeshua. However do not make the mistake that anything goes with Adonai. He will forgive us if we ask but if we refuse and continue to rebel against the word of Adonai HIS judgment will be swift and final. We as nation are reaping what we have sown.

Many do not want to look at spiritual side. We have too. Principalities have taken a strong hold in this country. This beachhead began in 1890. Slowly these evil forces have engulfed the country.

The only answer is prayer and then we must repent of our evil ways and then and only then will we as nation return to the grace and love HE gave us when we were founded in 1776.

Adonai is giving us warning after warning. We have not heeded the call.  I am very sad over this yet I will not give up the fight to stop this evil and the evil Obama from driving the final stake into the heart of this country.

Amnesty is all but a done deal. Sure the conventional wisdom is that this amnesty bill won’t pass the House.  With John Boehner is charge it will.  The gathering of information by the Fed’s is not a big deal according to the fake conservative pundits. Our Founding Fathers were against this type of information gathering on a general warrant was the reason behind the Fourth Amendment.

Our Leaders are now turning this country into a totalitarian hellhole by telling us half lies mixed with half-truths. the reality this is called lying.  Adonai warned this would happen. It is happening now.  The entire world is turned upside down. Right is now wrong and wrong is now right. The truth is a lie while the lie is now the truth. Only Adonai can save us now.

The Sixties Radical- George Orwell was Right. Big Brother is Watching You

We are on the verge of forever changing this country into a police state. Mark Levin made an off-handed comment on this very subject on his radio show about two weeks ago. Little did anyone know the truth behind this comment. Yet all one has to do is look at what is happening in this country since the evil Obama took office in 2008. Obama told the world he would fundamentally change this country. He has kept this promise.

However Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt sowed the seeds of our own destruction. These men laid the groundwork upon which Lyndon Johnson began to build the great society. Nixon, Jimmy Carter, both Bush’s, Clinton, and now Obama have just about driven a stake into the heart of this great country of ours. The only respite we have had was during the years President Reagan was in office. President Reagan was able to slow down this march to a totalitarian state.

We now have fools like Marco Rubio believing the lies of the Left. He is now single handily pushing for the destruction of this country through the push for amnesty. Rubio has bought the lies told by the evil Obama, Mitch McConnell, Chuck Schumer, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, La Rasa, and the other leftist groups. The lie is this. The system is broken and the only way we can fix it is to grant amnesty to illegals. For we are told these people who broke the law in the first place have a right to all the rights privileges as citizens. For these people are living in the shadows.  If we don’t pay for their health care, and give them welfare and access to the system we will destroy this country. If we don’t do this The Left, La Raza, and the Demo-Republican Party call us anti immgration and bigots. Yet the very opposite is true. For if we grant amnesty our country will be destroyed forever. Folks like me who scream out about this abomination are shouted down.

No one wants to ask this question. Why is the immigration system broken? This simple question can be answered in a few simple words. The reason why the system is broken we don’t enforce the laws we already have on the books. If we enforce these laws this will clear up about ninety percent of our problems and then we get down to the real ten percent of the problem.  Yet no one wants to listen this simple bit of logic.

Hey Rubio and the gang of eight you have just signed the death warrant of this country. And I hold you responsible for this. I will work like heck to destroy the very ideas and bull crap you are pushing,


You are a snake oil salesmen. You tell us the illegals will go to the back of the line. This is all based on a bunch of ifs. If you pay taxes. If you haven’t broken the law. If you learn English. If do such and such then and only then in fifteen years you will be granted citizenship. If we secure the border.  That’s a ton of ifs Rubio.

This is the big lie. Obama and the Democrats will never agree to this. A smart lawyer will take this court and your bag of ifs will be thrown out with the bath water.

This is all about the Democrat wing of the Demo-Republican Party gaining votes and kicking your silly ass to the curb.

Once amnesty is granted America be forever changed into a dictatorship run by the Democrats. This will be one party rule just like it is in California.

All one has to do is look to California and see what is happening there. This is what the rest of the country will look like.

Rubio you are liar. I will never trust or believe you again. Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me. I will not be fooled again. We were told the same crap back in 1967 and 1986. This pack of lies has to stop.

Couple this Obama and his merry band of dictators destroying the Constitution. These evil people are used the IRS to suppress the conservative vote in 2012 and now they want us stop voting and exercising our Adonai rights. Obama is using the IRS as attack dogs to go after all of folks who stand for Adonai, liberty, freedom, and the Constitution.  Now the federal government is using its vast powers to gather information on all of us. They are tapping our phones, our computers, recording our conversations, collection information on our health, now the Supreme Court said that taking a DNA swab during a routine traffic stop is now legal. The court argued that this is just like getting a fingerprint.

The wizards of smart are telling us this is not a big deal. So we are now under attack on all fronts- the government is taking away all of our rights so Obama etal can turn this country into a police state.

We are told all of this is done in the name of security and safety. What crock of shit. This is all about control and taking away our liberty and freedom. The evil Obama, Rubio, and the rest of the Demo-Republican Party echo this lie.

We are to shut the blank up and take it. If you don’t we will reign all the IRS and federal government on your asses.

Welcome to 1984.  Big brother is watching you.

The sole reason this is happening to us we have abandoned our founding principles the Torah, Tanakh, and Yeshua. Our country was founded on Biblical principles. We have now given Adonai the middle finger. Adonai will never force us to follow HIM.

We have sown our seeds of self-destruction and the only way out is prayer and repenting of our evil ways. Adonai is warning us by exposing all of this evil. Yet no one wants to pay attention.

I will never trust a politician again. I trust Adonai and Yeshua. That’s it.

This is from CNSNEWS-  “Screened from view by the dust-up over IRS and other recent scandals, an amazing left-wing power grab is being guided through the U.S. Senate.

This remarkable measure is the mirror-image of the IRS affair, the evident goal of which was to suppress Republican/tea party votes in the 2012 election. The current power grab would conversely give political backing to the Democrats, potentially adding millions of new-found voters in support of liberal causes.

The bill in question is the “gang of eight” proposal (S.744), which would grant legal status to an estimated 11 million Hispanics now illegally in the country (probably an understatement of the numbers), allegedly subject to safeguards and restrictions. It’s in effect an instant amnesty, though its backers say it isn’t, with the safeguards (maybe) to be added later.

Making this projected coup even more astounding, it’s being sold to the Senate and the public as a “conservative” measure, heavily advertised that way in a multi-million dollar PR campaign. Supposedly proving its conservatism is the fact that Florida GOP Sen. Marco Rubio, an early favorite of tea party forces, is one of its main backers, and by far the most vocal advocate for its passage.

Rubio’s name and voice are being constantly featured in radio/tv spots on a national basis, with emphasis on conservative outlets and markets where he would presumably be most effective (with back-up in a cameo role from Wisconsin GOP Rep. Paul Ryan). The ads are sponsored by a Mark Zuckerberg-Silicon Valley group calling itself “Americans for a Conservative Direction.” Oddly, before these ads appeared, no one had ever thought to describe the Obama-loving Silicon Valley moguls as “Republican,” much less “conservative,” in outlook.

A half-dozen or so GOPers have been identified with this “conservative” group, but the most recognizable names among them are Bush/RINO types whose usual statements on such issues are to the effect that the party needs to be less conservative, not more so. The whole thing looks like a stealth operation, hijacking the conservative cause, and label, to promote a liberal-left agenda.

This strategy becomes still more apparent when we note that among Rubio’s chief allies in the immigration battle are Sens. Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), two of the most hard-core liberals in the Senate. In other cases, neither of these has ever been bashful about seeking the limelight, but in this instance they’re staying modestly in the background, while tea-partier Rubio goes front and center.

The reason Schumer and Durbin like the bill is plain enough when we boil it down to essentials. Though everything else under the sun was debated during Senate mark-up, there is from a liberal standpoint one central, overriding purpose to the legislation: Enfranchising 11 million-plus new voters, the vast majority of whom will cast reliably Democratic ballots (70 per cent or so, based on election data from the past three decades).

Moreover, since the intricate, 867 page bill has numerous features strengthening “chain immigration” – bringing in family members of the legalized immigrant population-the true expansion won’t be 11 million, but many times that number.

Likewise, gliding along beneath the radar, the “gang of eight” proposal further includes the so-called DREAM Act, which would fast track to citizenship illegals who came here before they were 16 years of age (proved how?), even though they may now be 30, 40 or even older. Other parts of the bill are just as bad, or worse.

Rubio in his media pitch mentions none of this, instead focusing on aspects of the bill that can be described as “toughness” (the main theme of the bogus “conservative” commercials): Stronger border security that might be achieved in five years, or not, long waits for citizenship, preventing a further influx of illegals.

Unfortunately, we have heard all this before, in 1986, when the GOP was inveigled into supporting amnesty, in exchange for tougher immigration standards. We got the amnesty, all right, but the rest of it never happened. Now we have perhaps four times as many illegals as we had back then, while the Republican Party actually managed to lose Hispanic voters in the process (its share dropping from 37 per cent in 1984 to 30 per cent in 1988).

As for “tough” enforcement, does anyone believe the Obama regime will do anything whatever of that nature, given its track record of gutting the immigration laws already on the books? (In which respect, see the recent embittered statements of immigration agents who say they have been prevented from doing their jobs by this administration.)

Finally, there is the 10 year waiting period that according to Rubio will be required before the amnestied illegals will have full citizenship status (including the right to vote). It doesn’t take a crystal ball to foresee what will happen if this legislation is adopted. As soon as the Democratic lawyers can draft a complaint (which they have probably done already), they will be in Federal court arguing that we must have no “second class” citizens in the United States, and that people who are here on a legal basis should be allowed to vote forthwith, no 10 years about it.

Any bets as to how some liberal jurist will rule on that?


The Sixties Radical- It’s Time For The People of Faith to Act

I am mad as a hornet. We have John Boehner and his merry band of statist giving “We The People the middle finger with his bill to grant amnesty to millions of illegals. Boehner and the rest are banking on that many of these illegals will vote for Republicans. This is pure Crapola. Only seven percent of Hispanics voted in the last election. Boehner and these morons are pissing off his base. I am at the point where I am damn sick and tired of the Republicans bullshit. Many are pissed just like me. Look butt hole Boehner if it wasn’t for us you wouldn’t be The Speaker of House. Republicans wouldn’t be in control of The House and have at least a fighting chance in the Senate.

It is time abolish this government.  “We The People” are screaming this government is broke. We have our leaders who are governing against the people. We are not your serfs or pawns or servants.  We are the sovereign not you clowns. Adonai gave us these rights. Our founding fathers gave us this very simple yet powerful piece of paper called The Constitution. Now you clowns are using it for toilet paper. Mark Levin is right we are living in a post Constitutional society. Yet no matter how many ways one cuts this to Sunday this is what happens when a nation gives Adonai “THE MIDDLE FINGER”.  We have gotten away from our founding based upon Torah and Bible principles.

I don’t care how many meetings Congress has about the scandals and the disrespect for the Law and The Constitution and the Bill of Rights the President, the IRS or whatever government agency has these meetings will not fix the problem. The problem is very simple. The People of Faith, The Church and Synagogues have not stood up to stop this tyranny and attack on the word of Adonai and his people. Until the people of Adonai put a stop to this Godlessness changing leaders or members of congress will not stop this onslaught of soft and hard tyranny.

Congress, The President and Washington DC are den of evil. There I said it. Many don’t want to look at this. We have stopped being one nation under Adonai. Instead we are nation under the rule and leadership of Satan.

This step into madness began in 1890 when Woodrow Wilson, Teddy Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt began their attack on Adonai and the Constitution. These men are responsible for what is happening today. Wilson etal planted the seeds of our destruction.

We will not reverse course until the leaders and the people repent and turn away from our evil ways.  Until this happens we will have a one-way ticket to hell. Adonai is warning us but we are not listening.

The word of Adonai is very clear that wrong will become right. Right will become wrong. The people will stop seeking to please Adonai and turn instead to pleasing their own pleasures and desires.

What is happening right now is right out of the Torah and Tanakh.

Daily Caller- Republican lawmakers are launching an investigation into claims that the Environmental Protection Agency, while giving preferential treatment to environmental groups, made it harder for conservative groups to obtain government records.

“According to documents obtained by the Committees, EPA readily granted FOIA fee waivers for environmental allies, effectively subsidizing them, while denying fee waivers and making the FOIA process more difficult for states and conservative groups,” wrote Republican lawmakers, including Rep. Darrell Issa and Sens. David Vitter, Chuck Grassley and Jim Inhofe in a letter to the EPA.

Citing a report by The Daily Caller News Foundation, Republicans are asking the EPA to hand over all Freedom of Information Act fee waiver requests, responses to requests, and FOIA officer training materials since the beginning of the Obama administration.

The free-market Competitive Enterprise Institute obtained documents showing that since January 2012, the EPA granted fee waivers for 75 out of 82 FOIA requests from major environmental groups and only denied seven of them, giving green groups a 92 percent success rate.

At the same time, the EPA rejected or ignored 21 out of 26 fee waiver requests from conservative groups.

“The startling disparity in treatment strongly suggests EPA’s actions are possibly part of a broader effort to collude with groups that share the agency’s political agenda and discriminate against states and conservative organizations,” the lawmakers wrote. “This is a clear abuse of discretion.”

Republicans are tying the EPA to the broader controversy over the Internal Revenue Service targeting conservative groups.


What has to happen is we must get rid of the IRS. Congress has to introduce a bill to eliminate the IRS and set in motion legislation for the Fair Tax. Then we need to eliminate the EPA, Department of Education, HUD, all czars, and all agencies that are not part of The Constitution.

Mark Levin spoke about these ideas on his show on Wednesday May 15th and I agree with him.

No one in Congress has introduced a bill to get this done. We have Congress sitting on their collective asses pretending to work for the people. Instead you are acting like god and ruler over us all. You are making a loud noise signifying nothing. In the end you blow hards will do nothing and it will revert to the same old shit over and over again.

Congress needs to defund Obamacare. None on these chicken shits will do this.

Wall Street Journal-Many Republicans are enraged over revelations in recent days that the Internal Revenue Service targeted conservative nonprofit groups with a campaign of audits and harassment. But of all the troubles now dogging the Obama administration—including the Benghazi fiasco and the Justice Department’s snooping on the Associated Press—the IRS episode, however alarming, is also the least surprising. As David Burnham noted in “A Law Unto Itself: The IRS and the Abuse of Power” (1990), “In almost every administration since the IRS’s inception the information and power of the tax agency have been mobilized for explicitly political purposes.”

President Franklin Roosevelt used the IRS to harass newspaper publishers who were opposed to the New Deal, including William Randolph Hearst and Moses Annenberg, publisher of the Philadelphia Inquirer. Roosevelt also dropped the IRS hammer on political rivals such as the populist firebrand Huey Long and radio agitator Father Coughlin, and prominent Republicans such as former Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon. Perhaps Roosevelt’s most pernicious tax skulduggery occurred in 1944. He spiked an IRS audit of illegal campaign contributions made by a government contractor to Congressman Lyndon Johnson, whose career might have been derailed if Texans had learned of the scandal.

President John F. Kennedy raised the political exploitation of the IRS to an art form. Shortly after capturing the presidency, JFK denounced “the discordant voices of extremism” and derided people who distrust their leaders—President Obama didn’t invent that particular rhetorical line. Shortly thereafter, JFK signaled at a news conference that he expected the IRS to be vigilant in policing the tax-exempt status of questionable (read: conservative) organizations.

Within a few days of Kennedy’s remarks, the IRS launched the Ideological Organizations Audit Project. It targeted right-leaning groups, including the Christian Anti-Communist Crusade, the American Enterprise Institute and the Foundation for Economic Education. Kennedy also used the IRS to strong-arm companies into complying with “voluntary” price controls. Steel executives who defied the administration were singled out for audits.


This story is from ABC News- The Internal Revenue Service official in charge of the tax-exempt organizations at the time when the unit targeted tea party groups now runs the IRS office responsible for the health care legislation.

Sarah Hall Ingram served as commissioner of the office responsible for tax-exempt organizations between 2009 and 2012. But Ingram has since left that part of the IRS and is now the director of the IRS’ Affordable Care Act office, the IRS confirmed to ABC News today.

Her successor, Joseph Grant, is taking the fall for misdeeds at the scandal-plagued unit between 2010 and 2012. During at least part of that time, Grant served as deputy commissioner of the tax-exempt unit.

Grant announced today that he would retire June 3, despite being appointed as commissioner of the tax-exempt office May 8, a week ago.

As the House voted to fully repeal the Affordable Care Act Thursday evening, House Speaker John Boehner expressed “serious concerns” that the IRS is empowered as the law’s chief enforcer.

“Fully repealing ObamaCare will help us build a stronger, healthier economy, and will clear the way for patient-centered reforms that lower health care costs and protect jobs,” Boehner, R-Ohio, said.

“Obamacare empowers the agency that just violated the public’s trust by secretly targeting conservative groups,” Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind., added. “Even by Washington’s standards, that’s unacceptable.”

Sen. John Cornyn even introduced a bill, the “Keep the IRS Off Your Health Care Act of 2013,” which would prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury, or any delegate, including the IRS, from enforcing the Affordable Care Act.

“Now more than ever, we need to prevent the IRS from having any role in Americans’ health care,” Cornyn, R-Texas, stated. “I do not support Obamacare, and after the events of last week, I cannot support giving the IRS any more responsibility or taxpayer dollars to implement a broken law.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell also reacted to the revelation late Thursday, stating the news was “stunning, just stunning.”


Do you want these clowns in charge of your health care? NOT ME!

Try this one on for size. New York Times- “Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House.
Republican charges range from clearly questionable actions to seemingly specious allegations, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the carrying out of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama, who will soon know if he is dealing with a late spring thunderstorm that may soon blow over or a consuming squall that will leave lasting damage.

Representative Dave Camp, Republican of Michigan, the usually mild-mannered chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, set the tone Friday at Congress’s first hearing on the targeting of conservative groups by the I.R.S., laying out details, from the alleged threatening of donors to conservative nonprofit groups to the leaking of confidential I.R.S. documents.

In that context, he said, the screening of Tea Party groups for special scrutiny was not the scandal itself but “just the latest example of a culture of cover-ups — and political intimidation — in this administration


The real truth is this will all blow over. Congress, The Demo-Republican Party, The Left and the state run and state controlled media will circle the wagons and protect their own asses. This is just a big show put on for “We The People. “ Real change will not take place until we return to the word of Adonai.

The Sixties Radical- Rubio is a Well Meaning Fool Who is Willingly Sold a Bill of Lies

Once again we are being led by the nose by the evil forces that are destroying this country. “We The People” are being forced to be slaughtered by well meaning fools who do not understand what kind of people they are dealing with. Marco Rubio is a well-meaning fool that has been sold a bill of goods by Obama, The Left, Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, John McCain, and the statists in the Dem-Republican Party that the immgration system is broken NO SHIT SHERLOCK!  Yet no one asks the real question why is the system broken? In a few simple words- the system is broken because the laws are not enforced. If the current laws on the books are enforced this will clear up ninety to ninety-five percent of the problems we have. Then and only then can we get down the real matters at hand. To quote Mark Levin- secure the border and then get back to me.

This story just broke on the Mark Levin website Saturday May 18. House Republicans have just worked out a deal with The Democrats on their version of the amnesty bill. We have just been sold down the river by John Boehner and his band of Statists. In a matter of days this country will cease to exist. We have just opened the flood gates. Our leaders are governing against “We the People.” Lawlessness is now the law of the land. Mark Levin said it” We are now living in a post Constitution society.” Welcome the Police state called American.

Yahoo News-

A bipartisan group of House members announced a deal Thursday on sweeping immigration legislation, a breakthrough that could boost chances for one of President Barack Obama’s top second-term priorities.

It came after months of secretive talks among the four Republican and four Democratic House members had seemed to stall in recent days even as an immigration bill in the Senate moved forward. The House members met for two hours Thursday evening, emerging to announce they had a deal.

“We have an agreement in principle. We’re now going to work on finishing up the drafting of the bill,” said Rep. John Carter, R-Texas, a leader of the group.

Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., another member, said over Twitter: “Important breakthrough, some details still to be worked out, but very pleased things are moving forward.”

Carter and others declined to give details, saying they’d agreed among themselves not to do so.

Group members had been saying for months that they were near a deal, but in recent days talks appeared close to breaking down over a few unresolved details. These included a new visa program for lower-skilled workers, and how to handle health care coverage for immigrants in the country illegally who would gain legal status under the bill. Lawmakers and aides suggested earlier Thursday that one option would be for the group to release a bipartisan bill that simply left those issues out, allowing Republicans and Democrats in the group to offer their own plans on those aspects of the legislation.

Meanwhile, members of the group were under pressure to deliver from other lawmakers and outside advocates who feared they would lose their window to have a voice in the debate if they didn’t produce something soon. A bill released last month by leading senators is moving toward a vote in theSenate Judiciary Committee and has become the focus of the immigration debate.

“I am concerned that the bipartisan group has been unable to wrap up their work,” House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters earlier Thursday, before the group announced its deal. “And I know that there are some very difficult issues that have come up. But I continue to believe that the House needs to deal with this and the House needs to work its will. How we get there, we’re still dealing with it.”

The House group had struggled to come up with a plan that could have a possibility of passing the Republican-controlled House while also satisfying Democrats in the group. They have discussed a path to citizenship that would take 15 years for the estimated 11 million people living here illegally, two years longer than contemplated by the Senate bill, which is backed by Obama.

Overall, the legislation would share the same goals as the Senate plan: boosting border security, an increased focus on workplace enforcement, new means to allow workers to enter this country legally and the eventual prospect of citizenship for millions.

As the House group bogged down, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., separately has moved forward with individual, narrowly focused bills on immigration, including one on workplace enforcement that was discussed at a hearing Thursday.

The Senate Judiciary Committee held its third work session Thursday to plow through some 300 amendments to the Senate immigration legislation. The committee voted down an amendment by Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, that would have required the implementation of an electronic employer ID verification system in 18 months, instead of the four years contemplated by the bill.

Republican Sens. Jeff Flake of Arizona and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina — two of the bill’s Republican authors — voted with Democrats against the amendment, which was defeated 13-5. So did Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, a potential swing vote on the bill.

Thursday’s committee action was low-key, but behind the scenes efforts were under way to reach a deal on a series of amendments by Hatch that would benefit the high-tech community by making it easier for companies to access and use H-1B visas, which go to highly skilled workers. The bill increases the supply of these visas but also adds in protections aimed at ensuring U.S. workers get the first shot at jobs, and tech companies have objected to some of those provisions, which have been championed by Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., a principle author of the bill, was working with Hatch to try to find a compromise but the issue was unlikely to be resolved before next week.

In addition to Carter, Republicans in the House group are Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, Sam Johnson of Texas and Raul Labrador of Idaho. On the Democratic side, in addition to Gutierrez, they are Zoe Lofgren and Xavier Becerra of California and John Yarmuth of Kentucky.


We are told a pack of lies by the gang of eight, Obama, and the Demo-Republican Party that if we don’t grant amnesty we are hurting their dignity. If we don’t grant amnesty these illegals will stay in the shadows. If we don’t fix this problem now our economy will not grow. If amnesty is granted this will fix all of our problems. This is a bold faced lie. Rubio you are a liar. Schumer you are a lair. Obama you are a liar. The real truth is that you are pushing amnesty for illegals so you can stay in power forever. This is the real end game. The Democrat wing of the statist party needs a permanent under class to stay in power without serfs and pawns you would lose all your power.

Illegals are not in shadows. They are not living in fear. These people know we will never deport them. This is the lie told by La Raza, Obama, and the statists.

The other end game is to have open borders so the sovereignty of the USA is destroyed and the states of New Mexico, Arizona, and Texas will be returned to Mexico.

In a sane world this idea would be shot down in a second. This is what happens when a nation abandons Adonai’s word.  Yeah I know the argument how can you say this Gee Man for we must treat those who are strangers with respect and help them. This doesn’t mean they move in lock, stock, and barrel and take over our nation and destroy the very soverniety of nation.

National Review nails it on the head. Does Saul Alinsky strike a familiar note.

“In a recent NRO piece entitled “Saul Alinsky and the Gang of Eight,” I discussed how, if Schumer-Rubio becomes law, federal dollars devoted to “immigrant integration” will pour into left-wing and Islamist activist groups to fund their own vision of that process.

Now the 844-page bill has been replaced by an 867-page bill that makes the “Alinsky section” of the legislation even stronger. Under Section 2538, “Pilot Programs to Promote Immigrant Integration at State and Local Levels,” under “Authorized Activities” the bill states that “New Immigrant Councils” could be formed to promote integration locally. Originally this section, B(v), declared that the new councils would include representatives from “non profit organizations including those with experience working with immigrant communities.”

The current bill added the words “legal and advocacy” to this section. Thus, it now reads “non profit organizations including those with legal and advocacy experience working with immigrant communities.” Apparently the senators wanted to make sure that leftist and Islamist advocacy organizations (CASA, La Raza, MALDEF, and CAIR and other Islamist groups) would not simply be grant recipients themselves, but would also be entrenched on the “New Immigrant Councils” that will help guide strategy, funding, and implementation at the local level. One could guess why the four Democrats on the Gang of Eight wanted leftist and Islamist organizations with such “legal and advocacy” experience in behalf of immigrants placed on the new immigrant councils, but why did the four Republicans agree to it?


Schumer, McCain, Graham, The Democrat Party are the same folks who lied to us in 1965 and 1988 about how of we grant amnesty to all the illegals this would fix the problem. Read the Hart Cellar Act and Mazzoli Simpson Act.

This is pure BS.

We The People are the sovereign not the government. We give you the right to govern us. It is not you who are have the power to rule over us it is “WE The People” who have the right to abolish this government or alter it. We have the right given to us in the Constitution known as the right of revolution. See The Second Amendment as an Expression of First Principles- Edward J. Erler


Erler further states- “Furthermore, the Declaration specifies that when government becomes destructive of the ends for which it is established—the “Safety and Happiness” of the people—then “it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government.” This is what has become known as the right of revolution, an essential ingredient of the social compact and a right which is always reserved to the people. The people can never cede or delegate this ultimate expression of sovereign power. Thus, in a very important sense, the right of revolution (or even its threat) is the right that guarantees every other right. And if the people have this right as an indefeasible aspect of their sovereignty, then, by necessity, the people also have a right to the means to revolution. Only an armed people are a sovereign people, and only an armed people are a free people—the people are indeed a militia.

The Declaration also contains an important prudential lesson with respect to the right to revolution: “Prudence . . . will dictate,” it cautions, “that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes.” It is only after “a long train of abuses and usurpations pursuing invariably the same Object,” and when that object “evinces a design to reduce [the People] to absolute Despotism,” that “it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” Here the Declaration identifies the right of revolution, not only as a right of the people, but as a duty as well—indeed, it is the only duty mentioned in the Declaration.”

The prudential lessons of the Declaration are no less important than its assertion of natural rights. The prospect of the dissolution of government is almost too horrible to contemplate, and must be approached with the utmost circumspection. As long as the courts are operating, free and fair elections are proceeding, and the ordinary processes of government hold out the prospect that whatever momentary inconveniences or dislocations the people experience can be corrected, then they do not represent a long train of abuses and usurpations and should be tolerated. But we cannot remind ourselves too often of the oft-repeated refrain of the Founders: Rights and liberties are best secured when there is a “frequent recurrence to first principles.”

See above reference from The Erler article.

We The People are having rammed down our throat amnesty, gun control, and Obamacare. This is just the tip of the iceberg. We have a political class that is governing against the sovereignty of the people.

Erler lays out what the Second Amendment is all about. “  The Second Amendment reads as follows: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The immediate impetus for the amendment has never been in dispute. Many of the revolutionary generation believed standing armies were dangerous to liberty. Militias made up of citizen-soldiers, they reasoned, were more suitable to the character of republican government. Expressing a widely held view, Elbridge Gerry remarked in the debate over the first militia bill in 1789 that “whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia.”

The Second Amendment is unique among the amendments in the Bill of Rights, in that it contains a preface explaining the reason for the right protected: Militias are necessary for the security of a free state. We cannot read the words “free State” here as a reference to the several states that make up the Union. The frequent use of the phrase “free State” in the founding era makes it abundantly clear that it means a non-tyrannical or non-despotic state. Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority in the case of District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), rightly remarked that the term and its “close variations” were “terms of art in 18th-century political discourse, meaning a free country or free polity.”

The principal constitutional debate leading up to the Heller decision was about whether the right to “keep and bear arms” was an individual right or a collective right conditioned upon service in the militia. As a general matter, of course, the idea of collective rights was unknown to the Framers of the Constitution—and this consideration alone should have been decisive. We have James Madison’s own testimony that the provisions of the Bill of Rights “relate [first] . . . to private rights.”

See Hillsdale Imprimis Erler The Second Amendment as an Expression of First Principles.

The key words are private rights.

Erler further states: The notion of collective rights is wholly the invention of the Progressive founders of the administrative state, who were engaged in a self-conscious effort to supplant the principles of limited government embodied in the Constitution. For these Progressives, what Madison and other Founders called the “rights of human nature” were merely a delusion characteristic of the 18th century. Science, they held, has proven that there is no permanent human nature—that there are only evolving social conditions. As a result, they regarded what the Founders called the “rights of human nature” as an enemy of collective welfare, which should always take precedence over the rights of individuals. For Progressives then and now, the welfare of the people—not liberty—is the primary object of government, and government should always be in the hands of experts. This is the real origin of today’s gun control hysteria—the idea that professional police forces and the military have rendered the armed citizen superfluous; that no individual should be responsible for the defense of himself and his family, but should leave it to the experts. The idea of individual responsibilities, along with that of individual rights, is in fact incompatible with the Progressive vision of the common welfare.”

See Hillsdale Imprimis Erler The Second Amendment as an Expression of First Principles.

This is how the Left twists the language to suit the idea that the common welfare of the state is more important than individual freedom, liberty, and the sovereignty of the individual.  The state’s end game is to control us and take away all of our liberty so we will be forced to live under the tyranny of our leaders.

When we fight to protect our individual freedom this means we must fight for the right to protect our neighbors right as well. This is one of the founding principles of this country.

We are told by the state that we are not the sovereign and individual freedom is bogus. For it is “We The People” have the right to say to who can and can’t live here. Every nation in the world has the right to do this except the USA.  For when we stand up against the rule of tyranny and those who are on purpose destroying this country we are called bigots and racists by Obama, The Demo-Republican Party, The state run and state controlled media, and The Left.

This story appeared on the Drudge Report.

CNSNEWS-    “Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) entered a letter from law enforcement officials nationwide warning of the dangers of the immigration bill S.744 into the judiciary committee record today.

The letter To Congress from the National Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Council of the American Federation of Government Employees Affiliated with AFL-CIO warns of the discretionary power the bill gives to “political appointees” and takes away from law enforcers:

“Congress can and must take decisive steps to limit the discretion of political appointees and empower ICE and CBP to perform their respective missions and enforce the laws enacted by Congress. Rather than limiting the power of those political appointees within DHS, S. 744 provides them with nearly unlimited discretion, which will serve only to further cripple the law enforcement missions of these agencies.”

They warn that the Senate immigration bill gives DHS Sec. Janet Napolitano “virtually unlimited discretion to waiver” prohibitions on obtaining legal status, such as criminal activity or previous deportation:

“This same section (Section 2101 of S. 744) gives the Secretary of Homeland Security virtually unlimited discretion to waive any manner of crimes that would otherwise make an individual ineligible for legal status––for such expansive reasons as family unity, humanitarian purposes, or what the Secretary believes is in the public interest.”

“At least two of these standards appear undefined by S. 744 or current law, providing political appointees with broad authority to establish their own definitions of these terms and pardon criminal acts under almost any circumstance.”

“The bill states that individuals who have previously been deported or otherwise removed from the country are ineligible to apply for legal status. However, the Secretary is given the ‘sole and unreviewable discretion’ to waive that ineligibility for large classes of qualifying aliens.”

In seven instances, the bill grants “unreviewable” powers.

The letter concludes that ICE officers would continue to be “powerless” to protect the public and do their jobs if the bill becomes law:

“If this legislation were enacted tomorrow, ICE officers would continue to be powerless to effectively enforce our nation’s laws and provide for public safety as S. 744 does nothing to end these dangerous agency- and department-level directives.


National Review On line- “In any Gang of Eight–style caucus, assume that its Democratic members would not wish to endanger the present political realities that have changed the electoral map of the southwestern United States. In cynical fashion, Democrats will grant concessions on guest workers to pacify Republican grandees fronting for business, in exchange for amnesties that will maintain demographic dividends and their own political futures. As a general rule of thumb, any time a Democratic legislator praises a Republican counterpart for being reasonable and sensitive, we can equate such magnanimity with private guffaws about the naïveté — if not greed — of his opposite number. How ironic that the “Latino” vote is probably not what lost the Republicans the last election — instead, it was the working-class whites who stayed home because they sensed that they were not a part of Mitt Romney’s world, and who mostly oppose blanket amnesties unless they come with ironclad assurances of closed borders.

And what about the American people? The public that feels most immediately the social costs of illegal immigration bitterly resents the cynical non-enforcement of the law. Whereas professors in Maine or Wisconsin may see a liberal civil-rights issue, ranchers along the border or parents whose children are at a school in Tulare see only illiberality: the public bearing the social costs of employers’ greed, and an ethnic lobby practicing a disturbing chauvinism concerned not with illegal immigration per se, but only with illegal immigration from Latin America. (Were 1 million Chinese arriving illegally each year, La Raza would be decrying non-enforcement of the law and unfair competition to American workers.)

Solutions? Close the border. Deport illegal aliens who are not working and have been regularly on public assistance, have violated U.S. criminal laws, or have just recently arrived. After that, allow the law-abiding, employed long-term resident to pay a fine and remain on U.S. soil, while learning English and applying for citizenship — from the rear of the line. Aid the transition of American citizens off state support into the labor force; take the moral high ground with Mexico and demand respect for U.S. sovereignty and U.S. laws. Do not be bullied by La Raza, and instead understand the basis of its philological reality. Do not let yourself be demagogued by false charges of nativism and racism. Worry more about unemployed American citizens and stressed taxpayers than about Mexican nationals who are fleeing a nation rich in natural resources and in need of millions of reformers.

All that should be the basis for immigration reform — and thereby will ensure outrage from the special interests that are so heavily vested in the present violation of the law.


US News- Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, a newly elected Republican with a penchant for making headlines, filed an amendment that would bar undocumented immigrants currently living in the United States from ever earning citizenship.

There are an estimated 11 million people living in the country illegally, and a bipartisan immigration reform measure would create a pathway to citizenship over the course of 13 years by requiring those people to pay penalties and back taxes, as well as learn English. Conservatives opposed to reform decry the path as amnesty, but Democrats say they will not support reform that does not cope with the immigrants already living in the U.S.

Cruz also filed amendments that he says would “strengthen border security measures; reform the high-skilled temporary worker program; modernize, streamline and expand legal immigration; and prohibit federal, state or local entitlement benefits for those here illegally.”


CNSNEWS- The immigration bill proposed by the “Gang of Eight” in the U.S. Senate includes a provision to create a commission to study the failure of securing the border’s “high-risk sectors” during any or all of the first five years after the 844-page legislation becomes law.

On page 14, Section 4 of the bill, it states that if the Department of Homeland Security certifies that it “has not achieved effective control in all high risk border sectors during any fiscal year beginning before the date that is 5 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, not later than 60 days after the date of certification there shall be established a commission to be known as the ‘Southern Border Security Commission.'”
The six-member commission would be appointed — two each — by the president, and by the leadership in the House and the Senate.

Under Section 2, Qualification for Appointment to the commission, the bill states members “shall be distinguished individuals noted for their knowledge and experience in the field of border security at the federal, state or local level.”


This is the latest on the amnesty bill. www.marklevinshow.com

National Journal The night before Thursday’s marathon committee markup, members of the Senate’s Gang of Eight and their staffs huddled in a room in the Capitol to decide what amendments to their immigration bill they would let live—and what must die.

As a comprehensive immigration overhaul advances through the Senate, its chief architects will remain firmly in control of its fate. This week’s drama at the Senate Judiciary Committee provided a valuable test run for the group, which must protect their bill from changes that undermine the principles they agreed on but accept enough suggestions from their colleagues to garner at least a 60-vote majority, if not more.
It’s that kind of advance planning that helped the gang survive its first major test Thursday: a hostile amendment offered by Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. The Grassley provision would have required that the entire southern border be under effective control for six months before illegal immigrants could register for provisional legal status. The current legislation requires only that a comprehensive strategy for border security be in place.

Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., a gang member, spoke up first in defense of the current bill, followed by cosponsors Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.; Dick Durbin, D-Ill.; and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. They joined with the remaining Democrats on the committee to defeat the Grassley amendment, 12-6.

The margin was not happenstance. Democrats, combined with Flake and Graham of the Gang of Eight, outnumber opponents by a 2-1 margin on the Judiciary panel. It’s why the toughest test for the bill in the Senate will come not in committee, but on the floor after the Memorial Day recess. Still, the committee process is an important exercise as the gang attempts to maintain solidarity and begin broadening out support.

“The eight of us are convinced that we’ve done a very good job of securing the border. That’s not to say it’s perfect, and that’s not to say other suggestions wouldn’t be listened to and we’d have an open mind to adopting them,” Schumer told reporters.

The group did accept eight Republican amendments on Thursday, including six from Grassley and Sens. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., and John Cornyn, R-Texas (two were from Flake, a member of the gang).

“But we do have a bottom line, which is that the path to citizenship has to be based on specific achievable goals,” Schumer said. … “To have a sort of elastic goal that the next president, whoever he or she is, could use to block the path to citizenship—that would be a deal-breaker.”

Each evening, the gang will reconvene before the Judiciary Committee meets to analyze the next day’s slew of amendments and decide, collectively, what stays and what goes.


Rubio you are a lair. You have sold us a bill of goods.

The Sixties Radical- This is Our Wake Up Call- Obama is Evil

The attack on political opponents by Obama goes deeper than anyone has thought. Sure Bill Clinton used the IRS to go after his political enemies but what makes Obama evil is his wanton disregard for The Constitution, Bill of Rights, and rule of law. Obama thinks he can write as well as pass any law or executive order he wants. Obama no longer needs Congress to do this. He is our supreme ruler. Obama will stop at nothing to change this country into a Marxist hellhole.

The media is in his back pocket. So is The Demo-Republican Party. While this news of the IRS going after Tea Party groups, the real truth about Benghazi and the amnesty for illegals is taking a back burner.

With this three-pronged attack Obama acts like he has nothing to do with the mess that is happening in this country. Rush has called this the Limbaugh theorem. Obama is always running against the conservatives and he never is seen as governing so none of his policies stick to Obama. He has out slicked slick Willie.

By keeping “We The People” upset all the time Obama is able to sneak the lies past us yet lies always catch up with you. The lies are coming home to roost. This will happen in one fail swoop. It is almost at the point where the state run and state controlled media can’t protect Obama anymore. For “We The People” see how evil this man is.

What really grinds my ass is that the chicken shit Republicans won’t do a damn thing about this. These holier than thou congressmen are now talking tough. The real truth is these people knew about thus since 2010 and did nothing.  So we have Obama working in cahoots with Congress to take over this country and become dictators over us all. This is why I call it the Demo-Republican Party. (Harry Chalmers gave this term to me.)

If John Boehner and his silly band of chicken shit statists have their way they will pretend like they are investigation these scandals however in reality they will do nothing. John Boehner is scared to confront Obama and impeach his ass.

John Boehner is a coward.

Mark Levin and Tea Party groups brought all of this to light in 2012. Congress knew the truth. Now they act like this is the first time they heard all of this.

We hear the leaders screaming we have to get to the bottom of this. Hey you morons here is a news flash THE IRS CONFESSED TO DOING THIS LAST FRIDAY. There’s your confession now go after their asses and find out how much Obama knew.

This story broke on the Drudge Report Monday night.

AP- “The Justice Department secretly obtained two months of telephone records of reporters and editors for The Associated Press in what the news cooperative’s top executive called a “massive and unprecedented intrusion” into how news organizations gather the news.

The records obtained by the Justice Department listed outgoing calls for the work and personal phone numbers of individual reporters, for general AP office numbers in New York, Washington and Hartford, Conn., and for the main number for the AP in the House of Representatives press gallery, according to attorneys for the AP. It was not clear if the records also included incoming calls or the duration of the calls.

In all, the government seized the records for more than 20 separate telephone lines assigned to AP and its journalists in April and May of 2012. The exact number of journalists who used the phone lines during that period is unknown, but more than 100 journalists work in the offices where phone records were targeted, on a wide array of stories about government and other matters.

In a letter of protest sent to Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday, AP President and Chief Executive Officer Gary Pruitt said the government sought and obtained information far beyond anything that could be justified by any specific investigation. He demanded the return of the phone records and destruction of all copies.

“There can be no possible justification for such an overbroad collection of the telephone communications of The Associated Press and its reporters. These records potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two-month period, provide a road map to AP’s newsgathering operations and disclose information about AP’s activities and operations that the government has no conceivable right to know,” Pruitt said.

The government would not say why it sought the records. Officials have previously said in public testimony that the U.S. attorney in Washington is conducting a criminal investigation into who may have provided information contained in a May 7, 2012, AP story about a foiled terror plot. The story disclosed details of a CIA operation in Yemen that stopped an al-Qaida plot in the spring of 2012 to detonate a bomb on an airplane bound for the United States.

In testimony in February, CIA Director John Brennan noted that the FBI had questioned him about whether he was AP’s source, which he denied. He called the release of the information to the media about the terror plot an “unauthorized and dangerous disclosure of classified information.”


This is what happens to a nation when we turn our back on the Adonai of the Torah. The press attacks the Bill of Rights and now your right of freedom of the press is under attack. Look fools this crap goes both ways and you are on the receiving end of this tyranny.

You can’t pick and choose which Amendment you want to defend. If one goes they all go. This is why it is The Bill of Rights. It is not a bill of needs.

We are now in the process turning this country into a totalitarian state.

Here are some more lies that have seen the light of day. Thank Adonai for Mark Levin

Breightbart- When accusations first emerged in 2010 that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) had targeted conservative and Tea Party groups for additional scrutiny, it was unclear how widespread the problem was, or how to respond.

Some groups sued the IRS. Some contacted Congress, which sent inquiries to the IRS over a period of several months, beginning in October 2012. The House Ways and Means Committee, which is opening hearings on the subject on Wednesday, sent three separate letters to the IRS–but the IRS claimed no knowledge of the issue.

It took the efforts of Mark Levin’s Landmark Legal Foundation to find a strategy that would yield answers. Levin, who is also one of the most popular conservative talk radio hosts in the nation, decided to approach the Inspector General of the U.S. Treasury rather than the IRS itself, which is typically opaque in its responses.

In a letter dated March 23, 2012, Levin cited reports of unfair targeting, and reported: “The information demanded [of Tea Party groups] in many cases goes far beyond the appropriate level of inquiry [for tax-exempt status].”

Levin added that an investigation into the IRS by the Inspector General “also must determine whether the relevant IRS employees are acting at the direction of politically motivated superiors.”

Levin’s letter may have been what triggered the investigation that ultimately yielded last Friday’s extraordinary apology–ahead of next week’s report by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.

Levin described his experience to his listeners on Friday afternoon, describing a visit from two Treasury agents, who arrived at his office fully armed–they are “law enforcement,” Levin stressed–and interested in the evidence he presented, including examples of the excessive questions posed by the IRS to conservative groups.

Early reports suggested that the IRS had only recently become aware of the problem. However, the Associated Press reported Saturday that senior officials were aware that conservative groups were being targeted as far back as 2011.

Increasingly, Levin’s efforts are being recognized as one of the key factors prodding the agency to admit, finally, that it had used its powers inappropriately. Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich tweeted Sunday morning:


AP- Senior Internal Revenue Service officials knew agents were targeting tea party groups as early as 2011, according to a draft of an inspector general’s report obtained by The Associated Press that seemingly contradicts public statements by the IRS commissioner.

The IRS apologized Friday for what it acknowledged was “inappropriate” targeting of conservative political groups during the 2012 election to see if they were violating their tax-exempt status. The agency blamed low-level employees, saying no high-level officials were aware.

But on June 29, 2011, Lois G. Lerner, who heads the IRS division that oversees tax-exempt organizations, learned at a meeting that groups were being targeted, according to the watchdog’s report. At the meeting, she was told that groups with “Tea Party,” ”Patriot” or “9/12 Project” in their names were being flagged for additional and often burdensome scrutiny, the report says.


Wall Street Journal On line- The Internal Revenue Service’s scrutiny of conservative groups went beyond those with “tea party” or “patriot” in their names—as the agency admitted Friday—to also include ones worried about government spending, debt or taxes, and even ones that lobbied to “make America a better place to live,” according to new details of a government probe.

The investigation also revealed that a high-ranking IRS official knew as early as mid-2011 that conservative groups were being inappropriately targeted—nearly a year before then-IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman told a congressional committee the agency wasn’t targeting conservative groups.

The new disclosures are likely to inflame a widening controversy over IRS handling of dozens of applications by tea-party, patriot and other conservative groups for tax-exempt status.

The details emerged from disclosures to congressional investigators by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. The findings, which were reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, don’t make clear who came up with the idea to give extra scrutiny to the conservative groups.


The Washington Post- At various points over the past two years, Internal Revenue Service officials targeted nonprofit groups that criticized the government and sought to educate Americans about the U.S. Constitution, according to documents in an audit conducted by the agency’s inspector general.

The documents, obtained by The Washington Post from a congressional aide with knowledge of the findings, show that on June 29, 2011, IRS staffers held a briefing with senior agency official Lois G. Lerner in which they described giving special attention to instances where “statements in the case file criticize how the country is being run.” Lerner, who oversees tax-exempt groups for the agency, raised objections and the agency revised its criteria a week later.

But six months later, the IRS applied a new political test to groups that applied for tax-exempt status as “social welfare” groups, the document says. On Jan. 15, 2012 the agency decided to target “political action type organizations involved in limiting/expanding Government, educating on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, social economic reform movement.,” according to the appendix in the IG report, which was requested by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and has yet to be released.

The new revelations are likely to intensify criticism of the IRS, which has been under fire since agency officials acknowledged they had deliberately targeted groups with “tea party” or “patriot” in their name for heightened scrutiny.


The National Review-From the Jewish Press:

The passionately pro-Israel organization Z STREET filed a lawsuit against the IRS, claiming it had been told by an IRS agent that because the organization was “connected to Israel,” its application for tax-exempt status would receive additional scrutiny.  This admission was made in response to a query about the lengthy reveiw of Z STREET’s tax exempt status application.

In addition, the IRS agent told a Z STREET representative that the applications of some of those Israel-related organizations have been assigned to “a special unit in the D.C. office to determine whether the organization’s activities contradict the Administration’s public policies.” . . .

And at least one purely religious Jewish organization, one not focused on Israel, was the recipient of bizarre and highly inappropriate questions about Israel.  Those questions also came from the same non-profit division of the IRS at issue for inappropriately targeting politically conservative groups. The IRS required that Jewish organization to state “whether [it] supports the existence of the land of Israel,” and also demanded the organization “[d]escribe [its] religious belief system toward the land of Israel.”


Buzzfeed-The head of a Jewish group that says it was targeted by the Internal Revenue Service over its opposition to President Obama’s Israel policy said Saturday that she sees parallels between the tax agency’s treatment of Tea Party groups and her own case.

The Zionist group Z Street sued the IRS in the summer of 2010, alleging that a federal agent, Diane Gentry, told the group’s lawyer that the agency was “carefully scrutinizing organizations that are in any way connected with Israel.”

The group alleged that the agent told them that “a special unit” was examining whether its activities — in pushing a hawkishly pro-Israel line — “contradict the Administration’s public policies,” referring to a provision of the tax code which can deny nonprofit status to groups that oppose “established public policy.” The provision, rarely used, has been invoked to deny that status to racist groups.

The IRS admission Friday that it had created a special track for tea party groups “is the same conduct the IRS agent told us (before she realized she shouldn’t) they were engaging in with respect to organizations ‘connected to Israel,’” Z Street President Lori Lowenthal Marcus told BuzzFeed. “Of course, she also told us that there was a special unit in Washington, D.C. where similar files may be sent to determine if an organization’s positions’ differ from that of the administration’s. I have no way of knowing — at this point — whether any conservative groups that were targeted with the admitted bad conduct were also sent to that ‘unit’ or one like it.”

The IRS, whose apology was reportedly prompted by an impending critical report by its inspector general, has denied that the special tea party review was politically motivated. A spokesperson didn’t respond to an inquiry about the Z Street case. In 2010, a spokesman declined to comment on a specific pending matter.

But the case is about to get an airing: Z Street has a hearing this July 2 in federal district court in Washington, DC, Marcus said


from Jen Kuznicki- “Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration”

So said the report from DHS in April of 2009, “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment,” released just a week before the numerous April 15th Tax Day Tea Party protests.

That report so blatantly labeled those who demand adherence to the founding principles of this nation as hateful anti-government racists, it received immediate and overwhelming condemnation. The leader of the group that put it together, Daryl Johnson, told the Southern Poverty Law Center he felt betrayed by Janet Napolitano who initially defended the report, but after Congress denounced it, said she would have it removed from the government’s websites. The report still stands, though, and it is based almost exclusively, according to Johnson, as a reply to a question from the Capitol Police.

The report evolved in a complicated way. It began after a phone call from the U.S. Capitol police in January 2007. They wanted help with then-Sen. Barack Obama’s announcement of his candidacy for president. We monitored the Internet for about a month or so looking for threats to Obama. We didn’t see anything threat-related, but I started thinking, “What if the U.S. elects a black president? What impact will this have on extremism in this country?” It seemed pretty clear to me that it would lead to a radicalization and recruitment boom by white supremacists, militias and other right-wing extremists, because this is what they fear the most—a black president, the ultimate symbol of a minority population’s integration into U.S. society.

(emphasis mine)
So, basically DHS put out an extremely flawed report based on a hunch from an extremely biased government worker. By the way, the SPLC has been sending letters to your government agencies to continue to monitor you, based on the renowned crackpot thinking of Mark Potok and J. Richard Cohen.

If you are anti-abortion or against socialism, government workers are being directed to monitor your actions, based on the flawed thinking that it is because you are racist.

Because with pro-abort socialists in charge, you don’t have the right to disagree, you are supposed to put trust in your government.

So when tea party groups received letters from the IRS asking questions about their personal and political lives, their families, or whether or not they ever wrote down their opinions, legitimate questions were raised about these probing questions.
On March 22nd, 2012, IRS Commissioner Shulman denied that these questions were anything more than run-of-the-mill back and forth with your friendly government behemoth. The very next day, Landmark Legal Foundation sent a letter to the Inspector General, demanding an investigation into possible misconduct by the IRS and called attention to the politically charged targeting.

Last Friday, Lois Lerner, a high level officer of the IRS admitted to the targeting, but suggested it was just a few lower level people who were involved. By Saturday, we found out that she knew about it in June of 2011, and she “immediately” called for a change in flagging procedures.

Six months later, the flagging criteria changed from flagging any application that included “the words “tea party” or “patriot,” to, “ ‘political action type organizations involved in limiting/expanding Government, educating on the Constitution and Bill of Rights, social economic reform/movement,’ according to the IG report.”

Oh, okay, that’s better.

But according to the IG’s timeline, the IRS actually began targeting the groups in the spring of 2010.

Meanwhile, Obama spokesman Jay Carney insists on making sure everyone is aware that the IRS Commissioner at the time was a Bush appointee. This is inconsequential to the leagues of tea party patriot types that populate this great Nation.

It has been said, time and time again, that the tea party grew out of a resentment for the color of Obama’s skin. That is untrue, just like what Shulman said is untrue, and what Cohen and Potok and Johnson and Napolitano , all untrue.

The tea party began over the outrage of TARP, but grew significantly when Obama made his intentions for the country plain. They are not Bush supporters, nor are they Obama supporters.

Often maligned as conspiracy theorists, many tea party supporters have been vindicated over the results of the attacks on them by DHS and now the IRS, but the President himself has peevishly argued with tea party supporters, resenting that they don’t share his views, and suggesting they are against him because he is black.
The theme has been tested and proved to be wrong, but it does not matter to this administration.

It sounds like the flagging will continue, and if you have spent time educating the public on the founding and the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, you should have already received your letter.

So tell me again why I should think it’s a conspiracy theory to question the government?

Obama said recently at a graduation, “You’ve grown up hearing voices that incessantly warn of government as nothing more than some separate, sinister entity that’s at the root of all our problems,” Obama said. “You should reject these voices. Because what these suggest is that somehow our brave, creative, unique experiment in self-rule is just a sham with which we can’t be trusted.”

The message from your ruler is clear: Just trust us, stop resisting, we know what is good for you. But just in case you decide to try to disagree, we have a number of agencies which deal with taxation and law enforcement that can deal with this sort of nonconformity.



The Sixties Radical- We Are Being Led Like Lambs to The Slaughter

The more the truth surfaces about the gang of eight-amnesty bill the sicker I get. I should have known better. I had a great teacher on how bills become law. How back room deals are cut. Hell I am kicking myself in the butt for believing this Bullshit that comes outta politician’s mouths. Father Jack Flynn took me under his wing in 1988 and showed me as well as taught me what really goes on in Congress. Yes, it was on a smaller scale in New Mexico but still these same principles apply on the national level.

Father Jack would refer to this as horse-trading. You have something I want and I have something you want so let’s work out a deal that benefits both of us. The problem is this.  We the People get screwed.

The truth is this is power politics and about who can stay in power not what is best for the state such as New Mexico or the country. Very few politicians are concerned about what is best for the country they are only concerned about staying in power over their little thiefdom. This is what politics is about in New Mexico. I sat in those back room deals and saw how all of this crap was done. Father Jack taught me well.

All these people care about is acquiring power and keeping it. In New Mexico it is all about cutting deals so you can fill your pocket with the taxpayers money. Just ask Manny Aragon, Les Houston, Eddie Lopez, or Tom Rutherford just to name a few. The state of New Mexico was carved up into little theifdom’s so these people could stay in power and control the people and our money. This is the same principle used by Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, John Boehner, Eric Cantor, John McCain, and the rest.

Shame on me for forgetting the lessons taught to me by Father Jack Flynn.

Marco Rubio is doing the same thing. He is the front man for a bill he knows is bad for the country. Rubio can use as an excuse these people have lied to me. Look Marco, you knew this going into this deal. You went in with your eyes wide shut. Yet you chose to ignore the truth and this why you are a dangerous man. English Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain was warned about the real truth behind what Adolph Hitler was doing. Chamberlain signed the peace deal with Hitler and seven million of my people were murder by the Nazis. Chamberlain signed a worthless piece of paper. You are doing the same thing to this country. You are murdering my country. I hold you accountable if this bill passes as well as Obama, and The Demo-Republican Party.

The death of America is on your hands Marco Rubio.

This is taken from the National Review online.

At the press conference introducing their bill, the Gang of Eight evoked the spirit of Ted Kennedy. But the 24 pages of the 844-page bill (pages 370–94) dealing with “immigrant integration” stand as a rousing tribute to Saul Alinsky. If this bill becomes law, you can be sure, as night follows day, that federal dollars will pour into radical left-wing activist groups to promote “immigrant integration.”

On the surface, the bill’s provisions to “integrate” newcomers appear reasonable enough. Various projects are established to foster the “linguistic, economic, and civic integration of immigrants.” A public-private partnership is created; a pilot project is launched to provide funds to states, localities, and nonprofit organizations; and grants are awarded for the purpose of assisting “aliens who are preparing an initial application for registered provisional immigrant status” (i.e., legalization) and “legal permanent residents seeking to become naturalized United States Citizens.”

How will the “immigrant integration” section of the Schumer-Rubio bill work in practice? Let us examine how “immigrant integration” currently works in two states: Illinois and Maryland.

The State of Illinois established a Governor’s Office of New Americans (GONA) in 2006. The director of GONA declared, “Immigrant integration in the State of Illinois is made possible through our Strategic partnerships with community based organizations, local governments,” and various state agencies. GONA’s website specifically highlighted that its “strategic partnership” with the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (ICIRR) receives “national recognition.” The ICIRR will undoubtedly become a major beneficiary of the Schumer-Rubio proposal.

The major figure behind the ICIRR is longtime radical activist Joshua Hoyt. Stanley Kurtz in his powerful exposé Radical-in-Chief noted that Hoyt collaborated with Barak Obama and former terrorist Bill Ayers on issues related to the Woods Fund of Chicago, as it dispensed funds to radical groups such as ACORN. Hoyt was associated with the original Saul Alinsky front group, the Industrial Areas Foundation. Under Hoyt’s leadership, the ICIRR led successful campaigns to gain state support for illegal immigrants’ access to in-state college tuition, preschool, and health benefits, and secured recognition for foreign-consular (matricula consular) identity cards. Hoyt and ICIRR also supported Islamic groups that were resisting law-enforcement examinations of suspicious Muslim charities, and they worked with others to pass an Illinois law mandating that detainees for immigration violations have access to “religious counseling” (often from radical imams.)

On July 8, 2012, the ICIRR hosted “Electoral Organizing training designed for people who are planning to run electoral or issue campaigns in 2012.” Participating in the ICIRR’s electoral training was a close ally (listed on the ICIRR letterhead as an affiliated organization): the Council of Islamic Organizations of Greater Chicago (CIOGC). This group works closely with the Islamist (and Muslim Brotherhood–aligned) Islamic Council of North America. The CIOGC, along with the ICIRR, as well as the radical Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which is another official “strategic partner” of the Governor’s Office of New Americans, will clearly play important roles in any “immigrant integration” in Illinois.

At the center of immigrant integration is CASA de Maryland (originally Central American Solidarity Association) and its executive director, Gustavo Torres. CASA has tremendous influence in state politics both with the legislature and with Governor Martin O’Malley. Torres was co-chair of O’Malley’s transition team. He is a key member of the Maryland Council for New Americans, which advises O’Malley, and he chairs its working group on citizenship issues.

Torres left his native Colombia to support the Sandinista revolution in Nicaragua in the 1980s. According to the Washington Post, he was a Sandinista journalist who met his first wife, an American Sandinista sympathizer and “advocate for reproductive health,” in Nicaragua. The Sandinistas, it is worth remembering, were officially Marxist-Leninists — that is to say, Communists. In other words, during the Cold War struggle against Communism, Gustavo Torres of CASA de Maryland was not on the side of the free world, and he continues to this day to be a critic of Reagan’s anti-Communist policies.

Torres became executive director of CASA in 1993 and a U.S. citizen in 1995. In 2007 he spoke at a Chávez-funded conference in Venezuela on “revolution” in Latin America. Shortly thereafter, from 2008 to 2010, CASA received $1.5 million in funding from the Chávez regime. Besides Chávez, CASA’s funders include the Maryland state government, the U.S. government, the Ford Foundation, and George Soros’s Open Society Institute.

CASA’s major activities consist of opposing federal, state, and local enforcement of immigration laws. Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R., Calif.) has charged CASA with “aiding and abetting criminal activity” by teaching illegal immigrants “how to circumvent the law.” On May Day in 2008, CASA organized a demonstration that included contingents from the American Communist Party and the Socialist Workers Party. Not surprisingly, CASA and Torres are strong supporters of the “Cuban Five,” five Castro spies convicted by the American government, whose cause has become trendy for the international Left.

We can be sure that “immigrant integration” will work in the Senate bill the same way it currently works in the states. The left-wing groups that will benefit from the “Alinsky” section of the Schumer-Rubio bill include the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the Service Employees International Union, La Raza, the Asian Law Caucus, the National Immigration Law Center, CASA, the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition, and various organizations supported by Islamists and the Muslim Brotherhood. National Review readers have been alerted to the activities of these groups particularly through the writings of Stanley Kurtz, as well as David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin, co-authors of The New Leviathan.

As Lenin used to say, Cui bono? Who benefits? So who benefits from pages 370–94 of the Schumer-Rubio bill? Schumer knows. Does Rubio?


This story will never see the light of day in the state run and state controlled media.

The only way I found out about this story was from http://www.marklevinshow.com/

Obama goes to Mexico and blames Mexico’s gun violence on America.

Real Clear Politics- “Most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come from the United States,” President Obama said during a speech at Mexico’s Anthropology Museum. “I think many of you know that in America, our Constitution guarantees our individual right to bear arms. And as president, I swore an oath to uphold that right, and I always will.”
“But at the same time, as I’ve said in the United States, I will continue to do everything in my power to pass common-sense reforms that keep guns out of the hands of criminals and dangerous people. That can save lives here in Mexico and back home in the United States. It’s the right thing to do,” Obama added.


CNSNEWS filed this story. President Barack Obama, speaking in Mexico City on Friday, said the United States is responsible for much of the crime and violence in Mexico because of the demand for drugs and the illegal smuggling of guns across the southern border.

He told the crowd, “We understand that the root cause of violence that’s been happening here in Mexico for which so many Mexicans have suffered is the demand for illegal drugs in the United States.” He later added, “We also recognize that most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come from the United States.”

Obama acknowledged the illegal smuggling of guns into Mexico by American criminals, but did not mention the Justice Department’s Operation Fast and Furious that allowed the flow of about 2,000 U.S. guns to Mexican drug trafficking organizations. Fast and Furious began in the fall of 2009 and was halted in December 2010 after two of the weapons from the DOJ gun walking program were found at the murder scene of Border Patrol agent Brian Terry.

“In the United States, we understand our responsibilities. We understand that the root cause of violence that’s been happening here in Mexico for which so many Mexicans have suffered is the demand for illegal drugs in the United States,” Obama said. “So we’ve got to continue to make progress on that front.”

Obama opposes legalizing drugs, but wants to approach the matter beyond just law enforcement.

“I’ve been asked, and I honestly do not believe that legalizing drugs is the answer,” the president said. “But I do believe that a comprehensive approach, not just law enforcement, but education and prevention and treatment, that’s what we have to do. We’re going to have to stay at it, because of the lives of our children and the futures of our nations depend on it.”


Here’s a news flash for you Marco Rubio- OBAMA LIES. How can you trust him to keep his word? YOU CAN’T!

Now Obama trashes our country. Rush Limbaugh had this to say about Obama. This is taken from www.rushlimbaugh.com

RUSH: So let’s go to the audio sound bites this morning in Mexico City at the Anthropology Museum, present Obama speaking to Mexican college students…

OBAMA: (godlike reverb) Our attitudes sometimes are trapped in old stereotypes. Some Americans only see the Mexico that is depicted in sensational headlines of violence and border crossings — and let’s admit it. Some Mexicans think that America disrespects Mexico, or thinks that America is trying to impose itself on Mexican sovereignty or just wants to wall ourselves off. And in both countries, such distortions create misunderstandings that make it harder for us to move forward together. So I’ve come to Mexico because I think it’s time for us to put the old mind-sets aside. It’s time to recognize new realities, including the impressive progress of today’s Mexico.

MEXICANS: (applause)

RUSH: Right. You note the God echo is back, the God reverb. Now, ladies and gentlemen, I think this is an outrage. We had the president of the United States apologizing to Mexican college students for the way illegal immigrants in this country are disrespected. We take in millions and millions of them here, in violation of law. We feed and clothe and educate them and provide them health care.

The president of the United States is in Mexico apologizing for the attitudes of some Americans, that many Americans convey the old stereotype of Mexicans as illegal border crossers. He then apologized to these college students for America trying to impose itself on Mexican sovereignty. What? Would somebody explain that to me? I do not understand how we are trying to impose ourselves on Mexico.

It would seem, if we want to discuss this, that it might actually be the opposite. Now, this is the kind of thing that Democrats say when we go to Iraq or when we engage in military activity to liberate the oppressed, the tyrannized. Democrats never like that, such as Iraq. They always run around saying, “We’re trying to impose our way of life on people! We shouldn’t do that. We shouldn’t try and impose freedom.”

But it’s usually in the context of armed combat that they make this complaint. Now, we are not at war with Mexico. We haven’t invaded. Quite the opposite. So I really don’t understand the president apologizing to Mexican college students on behalf of people in this country because of the stereotypes in which you engage in when you talk about Mexicans, and for the attempt to impose America on them. I’m at a loss, I must tell you.

RUSH: Now, folks, this sound bite that I just played, if you have, despite my expert talents in explaining things, if you have not yet grasped the Limbaugh Theorem, it’s right here in this sound bite. Grab audio sound bite number one and play it again. There is a specific claim made by the president in this piece that illustrates the Limbaugh Theorem to a T. As you listen to this, I want you to remember that Obama’s not campaigning for office, that he is the president of the United States of America. He is the face of this country, and he has been for four and a half years.

OBAMA: (godlike reverb) Our attitudes sometimes are trapped in old stereotypes. Some Americans only see the Mexico that is depicted in sensational headlines of violence and border crossings — and let’s admit it. Some Mexicans think that America disrespects Mexico, or thinks that America is trying to impose itself on Mexican sovereignty or just wants to wall ourselves off. And in both countries, such distortions create misunderstandings that make it harder for us to move forward together. So I’ve come to Mexico because I think it’s time for us to put the old mind-sets aside.

RUSH: All right, that’s enough. Now, if he goes to Mexico as a candidate in 2008 and says that, that’s one thing. He has been president for four and a half years, and he’s down in Mexico talking about a country, America, that he has nothing to do with, it appears. If this country is attempting to impose itself on Mexico, who the hell would be doing that? There’s only one man who has that power. I can’t impose anything on Mexico. Neither can you. Nor can John Boehner, Mitch McConnell, Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio. Only one man can impose America on Mexico.

So here is Barack Obama going down to talk to the Mexican college students and sounding like he is as distant from the powers of America as the students are. (imitating Obama) “Well, you know, a lot of people in my country are doing this. A lot of people in my country think this, and the people of my country, five years they’ve been trying to impose, uhhhh.” Who’s the imposer? This is the Limbaugh Theorem illustrated to a T. Whatever America’s doing, it hasn’t anything to do with him. He’s got nothing to do with it. Whatever’s happening in America, it isn’t his fault. He’s got no connection to it. He’s down talking to these Mexican students as though he’s campaigning for office. As though he wants to fix all of these things wrong with America, but he’s been in charge of it for four and a half years.

So here’s the sitting president of the United States of America traveling to Mexico speaking to Mexican citizens, apologizing and criticizing the country he leads and has been leading for four and a half years. This criticism is offered in such a way that that audience will not associate him with any of the complaints that he has about the country. Thus Obama can never be seen governing. His fingerprints can never be on anything. This is how he gets away with constantly criticizing this country and for often apologizing for it. But in reality he’s criticizing himself. In reality he’s apologizing for himself, in addition to this notion that America is trying to impose itself on Mexican sovereignty? What is that? No, I don’t know what it means.

If he’s trying to make some disjointed connection to the way we are opposing immigration, and therefore opposing what Mexicans wish to happen, Mexicans want to come here but we’re saying we got some blockheads this country: “No, you’re not allowed here. We don’t like you. We don’t want you here.” That’s what he’s trying to convey. I think it’s outrageous, folks. I think it’s utterly outrageous to lie like this and to act as though he is not even involved in this country. Here’s the next sound bite. This is drug violence in Mexico. Guess what? America’s problem.


The reason why Romney lost wasn’t due to the Hispanic vote. Romney lost because white voters stayed home because they were tired of the same old bullshit Republican Party.

Rush explains this.

Now, Byron York in the Washington Examiner: “After six months of mulling over November’s election results, many Republicans remain convinced that the party’s only path to future victory is to improve the GOP’s appeal to Hispanic voters. But how many Hispanic voters do Republicans need to attract before the party can again win the White House? A lot. Start with the 2012 exit polls.

“The New York Times’ Nate Silver has created an interactive tool in which one can look at the presidential election results and calculate what would have happened if the racial and ethnic mix of voters had been different. The tool also allows one to project future results based on any number of scenarios in which the country’s demographic profile and voting patterns change. In 2012, President Obama famously won 71% of the Hispanic vote to Mitt Romney’s 27%.”

However, the Hispanic vote was 7% of the electorate. This is not talked about much, but I think it’s kind of important. Obama and Romney split 7% of the electorate. Obama got 71% of it; Romney got 27% of it. “If all other factors remained the same, how large percentage of the Hispanic vote would Romney have had to win to capture the White House? What if Romney had won 44% of the Hispanic vote, the high-water mark for Republicans achieved by George W. Bush in 2004?”

No Republican has ever, in a presidential race, gotten more. So plug that number in. What if Romney gets 44% of the Hispanic vote — which, again, is 7% of the electorate. “As it turns out, if Romney had hit that Bush mark, he still would have lost, with 240 electoral votes to 298 for Obama. But what if Romney had been able to make history and attract 50% of Hispanic voters? What then? He still would have been beaten, 283 electoral votes to 255.” Okay, so let’s get really big here.

“What if Romney had been able to do something absolutely astonishing for a Republican and win 60% of the Hispanic vote? He would have lost by the same margin, 283 electoral votes to 255.” Okay, so let’s go all-in! Let’s give Romney 70% of the Hispanic vote. It’ll never happen. That’s what Obama got. Let’s give Romney the Obama percentage of the Hispanic vote. Let’s give Romney 70%. “Surely that would have meant victory, right? No, it wouldn’t. Romney still would have lost, although by the narrowest of electoral margins: 270 to 268.

“(Under that scenario, Romney would have won the popular vote but lost in the Electoral College…) According to the Times’ calculator, Romney would have had to win 73% of the Hispanic vote to prevail in 2012.” What does this tell you? It tells me that the Hispanic vote’s not the problem, and I never have thought it’s the problem. You and I know what the Republican problem was in 2012. We just heard it late last week. It was a Pew Center poll. If the “white vote” had shown up in the same percentage and voted for Romney in 2012 as it voted for McCain in 2008, Romney would have won.

Obama got many fewer votes in 2012 than he got in 2008.

The difference-maker was, a lot of white voters stayed home.


Well, I’ll tell you.

A lot of Republicans think that white voters stayed home because conservative talk radio during the primary season demanded that Romney be a rigid, card-carrying conservative.  And because the right-wing conservative talk radio host demanded that Romney be something that he wasn’t, it turned off a bunch of moderate Republicans.

That’s not what happened.  What happened was — well, who can know for certain.  My best guess at what happened was, why the white vote stayed home, they didn’t think the Republican Party was conservative enough, but there was also a disgust, who are these people?  They’re the bitter clingers.  It’s one thing to hear Obama denouncing ’em.  It’s another thing to hear Republican Party going after everybody but them.

They’re listening to both candidates’ campaign, making appeals here and appeals there, making a generic economic appeal.  And I think there was just a general sense of disgust or resignation, just throw their hands up in resignation.  None of this relates to me, but the point is the Republicans are now accepting what the Democrats and the media are telling them, that they lost because the Hispanics don’t like ’em.  The Hispanics think that you Republicans want them to go away.  The Hispanics think that you Republicans want them to self-deport.  And if you don’t self-deport, they think you want to kick ’em out of the country.  So you Republicans, you better get with it, and you better make the Hispanics understand that you like ’em.

So the party’s doing that.  They’ve got this new pathway to citizenship immigration bill.  They’re saying all the right things.  But, again, remember, the percentage of the electorate that was Hispanic in 2012 was 7%.  Obama got 71% of it; Romney got 27%.  And if you reverse that, Romney gets 70%, he still loses.  The highest percentage of the Hispanic vote any Republican president’s ever got was Bush at 44.  So the point of saying that even if Romney gets 70% he would still lose, it tells you that the Republican Party’s problem is not the Hispanic vote.

It goes far deeper or is far more diversified than that.  No doubt about it.  How else would you read this?  If you give Romney 70% of the Hispanic vote and he still loses, with everything else in 2012 being the same, then what are they doing?  They’re following the advice of their consultant class.  They’re following what the media’s telling them.

They’re following what the Democrats are telling them, what the conventional wisdom inside the Beltway is.  I found it fascinating.


And like lemmings following the leader Rubio has jumped off the cliff and into the abyss. Except his face and finger prints are all over this bill. Now Marco Rubio and the Demo-Republican Party are leading us like lambs to the slaughter.